My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-26-1990
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
CCP 02-26-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:19 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 3:30:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />5. POISE AND BEARING Is he/she self-confidant and assured? Or <br />. does he/she seem to be uncertain of himself/ <br />herself, hesitant, lacking in assurance? <br /> <br />1. Timid, hesitant, adjusts to situation with difficulty <br />2. Appears to be overly self-conscious. III at ease. <br />3. Has good control, is moderately confidant, exhibits little tension. <br />4. Well poised, stable, adequately confident, commands respect. <br />5. Exceptionally well-poised and self assured; adjust to situations <br />with great ease. RATING <br /> <br /> <br />6. TACT Is he/she diplomatic? Does he/she say and do <br />what is proper to the occasion? <br /> <br />1. Uncivil. Offends by speech or manner. <br />2. Tends to be discourteous or thoughtless. <br />3. Considerate. Takes care not to wound or offend. RATING <br />4. Patient, understanding, polite. _.- <br />5. Makes the interview and exceptionally pleasant experience. <br /> <br /> <br />7. JUDGEMENT Does he/she oppose to possess ability to <br />weigh factors, draw correct conclusions and <br />make sound decisions? <br /> <br />1 't' 1 . " RATING <br />. Uncrl 1.C'.. NaIve. Comes to erroneous conClUSIonS. .. -'-- <br />. 2. -Jumps .to conclusion. Makes ill-considered dcci"ions. <br />3. Proceeds cautiously. Displays fair degree of judiciousness. <br />4. Tends to weigh situations carefully. Not easily confused. <br />Level-headed. <br />5. Keenly analytical. Decisions always logical and well-founded. <br /> <br /> <br />8. PERSONAL FITNESS In light of all the evidence regarding this <br />person's characteristics (whether mentioned <br />above or not) how do you rate his/her <br />personal suitability for the position for <br />which he/she is competing? Would you urge <br />him/her to undertake this work? Do you <br />endorse his/her application? (Please grade <br />from 3 points to 15 points.) <br /> <br />3. Unsuited for this work. Do not endorse. <br />6. Might do well. Hesitate to endorse. <br />9. Endorse <br />12. Endorse with confidence. <br />15. Endorse with enthusiam. RATING <br /> <br /> <br />Total Rating x 2 = TOTAL SCORE <br /> <br />. Scoring Guideline <br /> <br />80-100 Good Cdndidate <br />60-79 Acceptable Candidate <br />40-59 Doubtful Candidate <br />0-39 Unsuitable Candidate <br /> <br />---- -- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.