Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> "'--'I ,...., ~:~Df}J HILLS <br /> '-' _ ; "J <br /> j;).}.jUAR .c I Qcn <br /> . .0, ~..........v <br /> J,0.;:E S X <br /> various lakes makes getting arcund a little lougn. To a contractor. <br /> "getting around" or mobilization costs, can become a rather large portion of <br /> sma 11 jobs SUC~i r\S seC.~ coa:.ing projects. We therefore would advi~e the <br /> City to group types of ~ork wherever ~ossible, to minimize the amount of <br /> moving a contractor has to do. For example. if a group of streets in a <br /> particular neighborhood or area all have ratings of 90 or above, it would be <br /> economically wise to seal coat them all within the same street project. Bid <br /> prices should reflect the fact that all equipment necessary to complete the <br /> work will be close at hand and operating the entire ti~e it's on the job. A <br /> . contractor therefore doesn't have to recover his costs associated with <br /> ntl/ing equipnent s~::i~g on one jCb ~nen ~ [ c8uld be cpera:jng e1sewhere. <br /> To a somewhat lesser degree, this same method of grouping similar types of <br /> ~ork re12tes to over:2ying s~reets. Materials are brought into a certain <br /> area and immediately used. <br /> By using the ratings for each of the streets within the City as well as <br /> ~ our bes:: engineering judgement regarding grouping similar improvements, we <br /> - have drafted a two (2) year street seal coating and overlay improvements <br /> ;Jr8jr~m. The progra~ is based on an annual Ci::y budget of SlOO.OOO. The <br /> fol lowing tables sh~~ the proposed seal coating a~d overlay p.ogrrims for <br /> both 1990 and 1991. <br /> . <br />