CCP 04-30-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 4-9-90 , Page 5 CASE #90-02 (Cont'd) Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald, that Council approve . the Lot Combination of Lot 1 and part of Lot 2, Block 1, Northwcxxls, Case #90-02, subject to the following conditions: 1. That evidence of filing the lot combination and the previously approved Registered Land SUrvey with Ramsey County be suhnitted to Arden Hills prior to issuance of building or grading permits by the city. 2. That the city Attorney and Engineer approve the legal and engineering requirements, especially in regard to the drainage and other easements and status of the previously approved, but still not filed, Registered Land SUrvey. - Motion =ied unanimously. (3-0) Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald, that Council approve the Special Use permit for a medical clinic in an I-2 District, Case #90-02, Lot 1 and part of Lot 2, Block 1, Northwoods, based on the following: 1. A Special Use permit is required to operate a medical clinic in an I-2 District. 2. The clinic is a corrpatible use with recent development in the Northwoods Park complex and other development in this district. 3. Medical facilities are considered one of the higher quality business and industrial uses, corrparable to office uses. 4. Traffic for a medical facility is spread evenly throughout the day and will . not =eate peak hour traffic problems. 5. The Special Use permit and accorrvanying site plan require no variances and no special conditions. 6. The Special Use permit be subject to development in a=dance with the site plan approved by the Council as part of this application. Motion =ied unanimoUSly. (3-0) Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald, that Council approve the site Plan for a medical clinic on Lot 1, and part of Lot 2, Block 1, Northwoods, Case #90-02, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the City receive notice that the grading and drainage plan has been approved by Rice Creek Watershed District and the City Engineer. 2. That the applicant will work with City staff prior to installation of the lighting fixtures and if the lighting presents glare problems on adjoining property or public streets or if lenses are visible to vehicle operators along the street, the owner will adjust or replace the lighting fixtures as necessary . 3. That the applicant resolve appropriate park Dedication for this site. 4. That the Landscape Bond be suJ:mi tted as required by Ordinance. Motion =ied unanimously. (3-0) Council1nernber Malone asked the applicant to display a diagram of the proposed . signage plan for this site. The Plarmer displayed the signage plan and reviewed the requested sign variance. He explained the area is within the sign Ordinance requirements; the di1nensions of the sign are different than those required by Ordinance.