My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-14-1990
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
CCP 05-14-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:23 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 3:30:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> . . <br /> Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 4-30-90 <br /> Page 7 <br /> ~ KEM MILLING SITE; Council was referred to a report from the Clerk <br /> ABANIXlNID DRUM Administrator dated 4-27-90 and a letter from Delta <br /> DISPOSAL Environmental, relative to abandoned clrtnn disposal <br /> management at the Kern Milling site. <br /> Berger advised the work outlined in the letter was not included in the November <br /> 9, 1989 site de:rrolition work plan and estilTlated additional costs for the work <br /> will range from $4-6,000.00. <br /> Council expressed =ncern. regarding the increased costs. <br /> - <br /> Darrell Oman, Delta Environmental Consultant, gave Council a hdef up:1ate on the <br /> de:rrolition activities. He explained the original assessment reports for Phase I <br /> and Phase II noted the drums on-site and at that tbne some of the drums =ntained <br /> solid or liquid =ntents which were not =nsidered hazardous waste materials <br /> until sampled or tested. Oman stated the previous site owner was in the process <br /> of closing down the facility operations and salvaging equipment and materials; it <br /> was unJmown at the tbne if the drums or =ntent would renain on the site. He also <br /> noted a clrtnn survey was not proposed by Delta in the site de:rrolition work plan <br /> dated 11-9-89 and reviewed the reasons listed in the letter to the city dated <br /> 4-26-90. <br /> Council questioned the number of drums involved in the disposal. <br /> Oman stated his estimate is 15 drums and approximately 5 will require the <br /> ~ over-packing process. <br /> Council questioned the transportation of additional storage tanks to the site and <br /> how it is detemined there is no =ntamination in the additional tanks. <br /> Oman explained the general contractor brought the additional tanks to the site in <br /> order to consolidate other demolition projects; noted Delta was not aware of this <br /> pr=edure until the bid opening and at that tbne advised the =ntractor this was <br /> not a good practice. He stated the tanks are purged and cleaned prior to <br /> transporting to this site. <br /> council =n=ed to direct Delta Erwiromnental to conduct an on-site inventory <br /> of the drums renaining on the Kern Milling site and sul::rnit a change order to the <br /> City which specifically outlines all costs for disposal. Council further directed <br /> the Attorney to forward a letter to the contractor, on behalf of the city, which <br /> states that the additional storage tanks transported to the site be removed <br /> within 24 hours. <br /> CDUNCIL Cll'1MENTS <br /> JOINT MEETING; conncilmember Hansen suggested scheduling a joint meeting <br /> NEW SHOREVIEW with the Shoreview Council for the purpose of meeting the <br /> CDUNCIllffi:1BERS newly appointed Shoreview Councilmembers. <br /> Mayor Sather advised the Mayor of Shoreview has suggested such a meeting be held <br /> in June in order to allow the newly appointed Shoreview councilmembers tbne to <br /> become more familiar with their duties. <br /> ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.