CCP 05-29-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, May 14, 1990 Page 4 CASE #90-05 (Cont'd) Malone lOClVed, seconded by Growe, to approve the following . sign variance request for directional signs at McGuire's Inn (Howard Johnson), Case #90-05, 1201 W. County Road E, based on the applicant's removal of the canopy entrance signs, the directional signs being utilized to assist drivers on a public street with ingress to the site, the limited area for snow placement on the roadway shoulder during the winter months, and the necessity to increase the infonnation on the sign for vehicle/driver recognition and conditioned upon the applicant restructuring parking area near the westerly driveway entrance to maintain the 20 ft. parking setback requirement: 1. A Sign width variance of 3 feet 6 inches. 2. A Sign area variance of 8.2 square feet. and, to deny the sign height variance, based on the fact the sign height can be easily adjusted and the 8 inch variance requested will not affect sign visibility . Motion carried unan:im::>usly. (4-0) CASE #90-06; MINOR Council was referred to the Planner's report and Planning SUBDIVISION, 3947 Corrunission minutes dated 5-2-90, relative to the request ROLLING HILLS RD., for a lot split, Lot 7, Block 29, Rolling Hills No.6, JERRY MANSERGH Mr. & Mrs. Jerry Mansergh. The Planner stated the 80,107 sq. ft. lot is proposed to be divided into Tract A, with 45,650 sq. ft. and the existing house, and Tract B, which would be a 34,457 sq. ft. lot. The applicant is proposing to construct a new home for himself on Tract B and will sell the existing home on Tract A. . Bergly stated the Planning commission recommended approval of the requested lot split with six conditions, as listed in the minutes dated 5-2-90. He noted no variances are necessary to accomplish the lot split and the proposal meets all Ordinance requirements. Bergly explained Engineer Maurer reviewed the sewer access and recommended a sewer lift will have to be constructed by the applicant; the applicant is aware of this fact and has agreed to provide the lift. Public Works SUpervisor Winkel stated a check valve should be installed to protect other residents in this area and the applicant from a sewer back-up. Attorney Filla suggested Council require the installation of the check valve be attached as a condition of approval. Hansen moved, seconded by Malone, to approve case #90-06, Lot Division 3947 Rolling Hills Road, Lot 7, Block 29, Rolling Hills No.6, Jerry Mansergh, condition upon the following: 1. That the city Engineer and Attorney review and approve the division d=uments prior to filing and that necessary easements are secured. 2. That the City Engineer establish the minilnum floor elevation to which sanitary sewer service can be provided. 3. That the Rice Creek Watershed District approve the proposed development plan . and related requirements are met by the =er prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. That the proposed residence on Tract B be placed west of the point where Tract B is 95 feet wide. 5. That park dedication requirements for the additional wilding site be :met prior to issuance of a wilding permit.