Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> - <br /> MINUl'ES OF THE ARDEN HILlS COUNCIL IDRKSESSION <br /> MONDAY, AUGUST 20, 1990, 5:00 P.M. - CITY HALL <br />. CALL 'IO ORDER Pursuant to due call arrl notice thereof, Council1nernber <br /> Growe called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. <br /> ROLL CALL The roll being called the following mernbers were present: <br /> CollllCiJrnembers JoArm Growe, Paul Malone arrl Thomas <br /> Mahowald. Also present: Engineer Terry Maurer, Attorney Jerry Filla, Public Works <br /> SUpervisor Dan Winkel, Clerk Administrator Gary Berger arrl Deputy Clerk Catherine <br /> Iago. <br /> WATER TOWER Engineer Maurer reviewed the "rough draft" of the water <br /> STUDY Tower study. He outlined the following tllree areas of the <br /> study; the booster puIlping station, long term plans for <br /> the Arsenal property arrl deficiencies in the distribution system. <br /> Maurer stated the system appears to be sufficient to meet the =ent needs of <br /> the city. He explained he had researched the best location for installation of a <br /> booster puIlping station arrl noted locations along County Road E that would best <br /> serve the existing system. <br /> Maurer explained the =ent water utility system would not serve the needs of <br /> the Arsenal property, in the event that larrl is developed. He advised a separate <br /> water pipe along Harnline Avenue from Roseville to the Arsenal would have to be <br /> installed to service the area. <br />. The Engineer reviewed the minor deficiencies in the existing system which are <br /> located near Mounds view School arrl in the Gateway Business District. He stated <br /> flowage problems were identified in these areas arrl ".:wised the problems are easy <br /> to co=ect. <br /> Maurer estimated the cost to upgrade the =ent system would be $80,000.00; <br /> estimated the booster station installation at $130,000.00. <br /> The Engineer stated he will fonnalize the rough draft of the study within the <br /> next two weeks arrl suhnit the doct.nnel1t to council for review arrl recommendation. <br /> Council thanked Maurer for his presentation. <br /> PROP'D CC>>IBINATION; CollllCil was referred to a letter from Attorney Filla <br /> BOARD OF M!PFAIS/ dated 1-26-90, relative to combining the duties of the <br /> PIlINNING COMMISSION Board of Appeals arrl Planning Commission. <br /> Filla reported on a survey he conducted with surrounding communities to detennine <br /> if they utilize a separate body to perfom the duties of the Board of Appeals; <br /> White Bear Lake is the only city which has a separate Board of Appeals, the <br /> majority of communities delegate the Board's statutory duties to the Planning <br /> Planning Commission. <br /> The Attorney stated it may be more efficient to utilize the Planning Commission <br /> for both functions, rather than separate bodies, based on: the number re::[Uests <br />. =ently suhnitted, the number of meetings required to review applications in a <br /> timely manner, staff support time required for Board agendas, arrl duplication of <br /> staff time when matters are presented to both bodies for review. <br /> Filla stated, the all mernber of the Planning Commission may serve as the Board or <br /> a subcommittee may be designated. <br />