Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> , <br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, October 9, 1990 <br />Page 4 <br />~E #90-11 (Cont'd) Council1nernber Growe questioned if a precedent will be . <br /> established by allowing the courtyard area to be included <br />as part of the landscaping percentage calculations for this site. <br />Planner Bergly advised. that Council could identify the rationale for allowing the <br />courtyard area to be utilized in the calculations. <br />Councilmernber Malone recalled that Carroll's Furniture was allowed to utilize a <br />con=ete island as part of the "open space" requirements; it appears the intent <br />of the courtyard design is to give the effect of landscaped area. <br />Malone expressed. concern regarding the following items: <br />1. Parking; must provide adequate on-site parking spaces. <br />2. storm water retention plan. <br />3. Bell Tower/Chimes proposed in the phased construction; if nuisance complaints <br />received from surrounding residential areas may have to restrict use. <br />Malone requested to be placed on record as advising the applicant that off-site <br />parking will be strictly enforced, due to the narrowness of city streets. <br />The Planner advised the proposed parking exceeds the minimum spaces required for <br />churches, auditoriums, etc., in the zoning code. <br />Bergly stated the applicant is proposing to divert the storm water to a catch . <br />basin located on site; the RCWD has issued a permit for the site. He noted the <br />Corps of Engineers has also issued a wetlands permit and MN/oor has authorized an <br />access permit from Highway 96. <br />Malone discussed the storm water runoff which will be metered off-site from the <br />peneling area shown on the plan. <br />The architect advised the Engineer has reviewed the plan. <br />There was discussion regarding the proposed bell tower/chimes. <br />Malone reminded the applicant that if objections are received from surrounding <br />residential development, the chimes may have to be adjusted in the future. <br />Councilmernber Hansen questioned if a lighting plan is suhnitted with the site <br />plan. <br />Planner Bergly advised. the lighting plan was suhnitted and meets code <br />requirements. <br />Fire Chief Winkel questioned the width of the interior streets between parking <br />spaces and if the facilities have sprinkler systems installed. <br />The architect stated the interi= streets are approximately 25-30 ft. in width <br />and should a=ornmodate emergency vehicles for access. He noted both the church <br />and parish hall have sprinkler systems proposed for installation. . <br />The Planner advised. Council the signage plan suhnitted has no changes proposed > <br />and meets all code requirements. <br />Bergly noted that two actions are required for approval of the application; <br />approval of the Special Use Permit and site Plan. <br />