CCP 10-29-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, October 9, 1990 Page 5 . CASE #90-11 (OONT'D) Mahowald moved, seconded by Growe, that Council approve Case #90-11, Special Use Pennit for a House of Worship, Highway 96 and Snelling Avenue, based and conditioned upon items A thru I, as listed in the Planner's report and Planning Conunission minutes dated 10-3-90, a copy of which is attached and two additional Items: J. Applicant satisfaction of park dedication requirement pri= to issuance of a wilding pennit and K. Fire Chief review and approval of site plan. Motion carried unaniInously. (5-0) Mahowald moved, seconded by Malone, that Council approve Case #90-11, Approval of the Revised site Plan suhnitted 10-3-90, and conditioned upon the Fire Chief's review and approval of the site plan for access of emergency vehicles and no occupancy pennit being issued prior to resolution of park dedication. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) John Buhajenko extended thanks on behalf of the congregation and invited Council1nembers to attend a ceremony at the Church site on Saturday, October 13, at 3:00 p.m. CASE #90-14; SITE Council was referred to the Planner's report and Planning PIAN REVIEW, 3776 Conunission minutes dated 10-3-90, relative to the CDNNOLLY AVE, Par application for site Plan Review for a building addition o GOID BINGO HALL, at the Pot 0 Gold Bingo Hall, 3776 Connolly Avenue, Louie IDillE WAISH Walsh. Planner Bergly,explained the initial approval for the Bingo Hall conversion from . a lumberyard was granted in 1986. He advised at that t:iJne the site plan review included detennining the mnnber of parking spaces, landscaping plan development and lighting. Bergly advised at. this t:iJne the applicant is proposing a 14 ft. x 80 ft. wilding addition to aCCOl'lU'OCldate a nonsmoking area for bingo players. He noted the parking which is =ently located in the area of the proposed addition will be relocated to the northerly area of the site. The Planner advised the northwest COIner of the site is =ently a gravel surface and city code requires parking areas be hard-surfaced; the applicant should be required to install a hard-surface in this area of the site, whether or not approval is granted for the building addition. Bergly stated the Planning Conunission recornmerrled denial of the request, based on 1. The =ent status of the I.ex:ington/Fox b.1siness study area, which is now under a development moratorium and the expansion does not meet the proposed guidelines for rezoning of this area; and, 2. Due to the lack of complete documentation suhnitted by applicant for site plan review. The Planner stated Conunission suggested the applicant may explore the possibility of =eating an interior area for nonsmokers, which would be separated from the main area by use of glass walls, and may be less expensive than a building addition. Councilrnernber Hansen stated opposition to expanding the facility at this t:iJne and . expressed concern regarding the appearance of the wilding and site in general. . She suggested the applicant be required to install a hard-surfaced parking area and perf= a general upgrade of the existing buildings on site. Hansen recalled she contacted City staff on several oo::asions during the last few years to have the mechanical equipment on this site screened. --------