Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, October 9, 1990 <br />Page 6 <br />CASE #90-14 (Cont'd) CounciJ1nember Growe also stated opposition to the . <br /> proposal, due to the moratorium enacted by eouncil action <br />this evening. She advised she recently viewed the interior of the bingo hall and <br />there appears to be enough space inside to enclose an area for nonsmoking. Growe <br />also expressed concern that the hard-surfaced area has not been installed over <br />the past four years the hall has been in operation. <br />counciJ1nember Malone questioned if the paving of the parking lot area was a <br />condition of approval when the original site plan was reviewed by eouncil in <br />1986. <br />Planner Bergly stated the eouncil action did not specifically require the paving, <br />however, hard-surfaced area is required by City code. <br />Malone explained in an I-1 District the wIding meets =ent code and the <br />applicant sul:rnitted the application one month prior to the iIrq:x:>Sition of the <br />moratorium. <br />CounciJ1nember Malone suggested if approval is granted the applicant be advised <br />the monies spent on expansion of the facility will not be recouped in the future, <br />based on the proposed development guidelines and rezoning of the area and that <br />in'provement of the parking area be a condition of approval. <br />Mayor Sather agreed with CounciJ1nember Malone that theoapplication be considered <br />for action and stated it may be difficult for legal counsel to defend action to <br />deny based on the moratorium iIrq:x:>Sition. He also agreed the applicant should be . <br />required to install the paved area within a thirty day period. <br />Marlyn DaIrnnan, representing American Business Women's Association, stated she is <br />appalled by the condition of the bingo hall and Council should review the <br />operation of the hall. IJa1nI'ran confirmed that there is sufficie.nt area inside the <br />facility to enclose an area for nol1SlOClking patrons. She reviewed the recent <br />dispute between management and renters of the facility regarding the amount of <br />space and cost of rental; indicated the management is requesting the addition to <br />justify higher rental fees for the charities operating at the hall. <br />CounciJ1nember Malone stated the city cannot regulate the operation of the bingo <br />hall management, only regulate the building meeting code requirements. <br /> Malone moved, seconded by Sather, to approve the site <br />Plan Review, Case #90-14, for a building addition at the Pot 0 Gold Bingo Hall, <br />3776 Connolly, subject to the property owner being notified of the following: l. <br />That with the intended rezoning of the property, the building will become <br />nonconforming and future modifications will not be pennitted without upgrading of <br />the facility; 2. That a building pennit for the addition will not be issued until <br />the surfacing of the parking area is installed in the northwest area of the site <br />to aCCClll1lOOdate parking and meet code requirements; and, 3. That ten additional <br />parking spaces will be added in the northeast corner of the site, to aCCClll1lOOdate <br />removal of parking for the building addition, and the railroad spur removed, <br />prior to issuance of a building pennit. Motion failed. (Malone, Sather voting in <br />favor; Hansen, Growe and Mahowald opposed) (2-3) .. <br />Planner Bergly recommended that action for denial of the application include <br />rationale. <br />