Laserfiche WebLink
<br />While sixty-four percent favor the City initiating action to <br />... speed up the sale of the Arsenal property, sixty-five percent <br />also feel the community should regulate its use instead of <br />outright purchasing it. In fact, seventy-four percent would <br />oppose a referendum to increase property taxes to fund the <br />Arsenal property purchase and redevelopment; fifty-one percent <br />indicated "strong opposition." Forty-seven percent would favor <br />the City buying parts of the property; but, again, the fate of a <br />referendum to issue bonds is indeed pessimistic. If that <br />property is developed, though, residents lean toward a mixed use, <br />featuring single family dwellings, light industry, and <br />recreational and park areas. <br /> <br />After being informed of the inadequacies of the present city <br />Hall, a fifty-eight percent to twenty-nine percent margin favored <br />the construction of a new one. A majority would support a multi- <br />use facility containing space to be rented to other government <br />bodies. The current site for this new facility was favored by <br />sixty-four percent of the sample; no other site generated much <br />enthusiasm. A popularly supported community center addition <br />would contain only meeting rooms for community groups; athletic <br />facilities and an indoor swimming pool were opposed by strong <br />majorities. The residents split, though, in their support for a <br />stand-alone city Hall versus one with a community center <br />addition: thirty-seven percent prefer the former, while thirty- <br />nine percent opted for the latter. By a narrow forty-seven <br />. percent to forty-five percent margin, residents would support a <br />bond referendum for a new City Hall. They would oppose a <br />combination City Hall-Community Center bond referendum by a <br />fifty-eight percent to thirty six percent margin. Neither of <br />these margins bode well for a successful special election bond <br />referendum. Under these circumstances, the City may wish to <br />investigate funding alternatives which do not require a bond <br />referendum election. <br /> <br />The issue of financial responsibility for neighborhood <br />improvements found residents arriving at different conclusions <br />for each type of project. sixty-one percent felt the entire city <br />should pay for street reconstruction. Forty-seven percent felt <br />similarly about the addition of street lighting. On sidewalks, <br />though, citizens were split: Forty-one percent felt the area of <br />the city under construction should bear the costs, while thirty- <br />eight percent felt it should be shared citywide. A consensus has <br />developed, though, around the appropriate formula for a cost- <br />sharing arrangement between impacted residents and city as a <br />whole: strong support existed for a one-third/two-thirds split, <br />with the city paying the larger portion. <br /> <br />The City has a very well developed and focused <br />communications system. Majorities look to the "Town Crier" as <br />their principal source of information about community events and <br />. city government activities. The "Focus" and the "New Brighton <br />Bulletin" ranked in the distant second tier. Even so, the two <br />newspapers were read by approximately eighty-seven percent of the <br />residents. An incredibly high ninety-four percent of the <br /> <br />6 <br />