CCP 12-10-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 12-10-90 Page 5 .'.) CASE #90-09 (Cont'd) Malone moved, secorrled by Mahowald, to accept the . development concept as sutmitted, with the corrlition that any departure frcnn this concept will be resubnitted to the City as a site plan amendment, with the stages of development as outlined under Items 2. A and B, to be the development plan, and based on the findings, both as listed in the Planner's report dated 12-5-90. Motion =ied unanimously. (3-0) Malone moved, secorrled by Mahowald, to accept the revised site plan, dated October 19, 1990, f= the first stage and final development stage, based on the findings of the Planner as outlined in his report dated 12-5-90, and incorporating by reference all the site and phasing plans provided by the applicant. Motion =ied unanimously. (3-0) Mahowald noted the applicant indicated willingness to install a ba=ier of senne type or landscaping along the south property line; questioned if this natter should be incorporated into the corrlitions. Malone carrnnented the City Engineer will approve the grading and drainage plan and thus by linplication the applicant offers to insure that drainage is not a problem to the south. Malone noted the Planning Commission discussed the zoning ordinance reference to lighting and the differentiation between the luminaire and the lens. He stated the ordinance requires the lumina ire not be visible frcnn the street and the Planning Commission requested the lens not be visible fram the street; questioned if this is feasible. . Bergly stated it would not be feasible to require the lens not be visible; the lighting fixtures will natch the property to the south of this site. Foster advised he is willing to work with staff to meet lighting requirements. Malone moved, secorrled by Mahowald, to require that the following general corrlitions be met prior to issuance of a building permit, for this site: .,.... .: .,~. A. That the two lots be combined and that appropriate utility and drainage easements be granted to the City, subject to administrative approval. B. That a document providing a pennanent. access easement across the Control Data Corporation drive frcnn Lexington Avenue to the west parking lot, and preferably to Fernwood Avenue, be approved the City Attomey. C. That easement be granted for fire lanes as required. D. That the city Engineer approve the grading and drainage plan and that the Rice Creek Watershed District issue an appropriate permit. E. That the City park dedication requirements be satisfied. F. That a landscaping borrl be posted in an amount to be determined by the Planner . Motion =ied unanimously. (3-0) Council1nember Malone advised the applicant that the park dedication is to be negotiated with Council1nember Mahowald, and that the drainage plan approval includes responsibility of the owner to provide any co=ective measures necessary . if drainage problems occur on adjacent properties. CASE #90-17; MINOR Council was referred to the Planner's report and SUBDIVISION, 1245 Planning minutes dated 12-5-90, relative to the NURSERY HILL cr, application for a minor sulxiivision at 1245 Nursery EIBENSI'EINER Hill Court, Robert and Marcel Eibensteiner.