CCP 02-24-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.. Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeti.n;J, 1-13-92 ", "'. Page 3 PERMIT (Cant' d) Brunzel advised the organization is confident the . expenditure requirements will be met in a timely fashion in 1992; explaine:i the organization is not comfortable operati.n;J in this fashion. She indicated Charitable Garobli.n;J has change:i substantially over the last few years and the organization has had to make an effort to tmd.erstand the letter of the laws. Cauncill1lernber Mahowald thanke:i the Turner's organization for the good faith efforts to bri.n;J this matter to a resolution. Mahowald aske:i the City Attorney if the proposal meets state statute requirements . Attorney Filla indicate:i the payments should have =e:i within calendar year 1991, however, if the City accepts the promissory note and payment =s prior to the state license renewal period, the organization would be in compliance with the Ordinance regulations. There was discussion regardi.n;J language which should be include:i in the promissory note to insure the city is protected and state approval does not occur pri= to payment of the note. Attorney Filla explaine:i the agreement should include language that indicates if the promissory note is not paid in full, Turner's would withdraw the state application for a premise permit. . Mahowald rnove:i, second.e:i by Growe, to adopt Resolution No. 92-06, APPROVING CHARITABLE GAMBLING PREMISE PERMIT APPLICATION, st. Paul Turner's Gynmastic Society, for Class A Bi.n;Jo operations at Pot-()-{;old Hall, cond.itione:i upon the organization enteri.n;J into an agreement with the city of Arden Hills to provide an additional $20,000.00 payment for lawful purposes within the Arden Hills trade area, pursuant to the state statute, by March 20, 1992, and agree to withdraw its 1992 state application for premise pennit if the additional contril::ution is is not made by the establishe:i date and waive any notice requirements on administrative heari.n;Js. Motion carrie:i unanimously. (5-0) RES. #92-05; Cauncil was referre:i to the memorandum from the Clerk ORDER FEASIBILITY Administrator dated 1-9-92, and attache:i co=espond.ence RPI'.; KEITHSON POND regardi.n;J the Kei thson Pond. Irrprovements. Engineer Graham reviewe:i his letter dated January 8, which outlines the proposed i111provements for the pond. and estlinated construction costs. He explaine:i the attache:i design report was fo:ruarde:i to the Rice Creek Watershed District for review. Graham recormnende:i the city receive bids for the project, based on the complexity of the project, and in order to review firm construction cost figures for discussion purposes when consideri.n;J the i111provement. He further recommended the biddi.n;J precess allows the city to keep all options open for funding the project. Graham advised the city Attorney received a request from the members of the committee appointed to review the cond.emnation of the Reiling property to stake . the pond. area.