Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION — MARCH 11, 2024 12 <br />Mayor Grant thought this could be looked at as a vegetative fence, and fences have permanency <br />in placement in law. <br />Councilmember Monson didn't know why they were singling out this one landowner, she would <br />like to move forward with what he has and talk about the policy. <br />Councilmember Holden would like the trees removed, that was what was done in the past and he <br />chose to replant them. There is a tree planted every three feet, which means they weren't planting <br />to enhance the park, they were planting to create a fence and expand their back yard. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe said in the letter sent in 2019 to approximately 20 <br />property owners, one of the remedies was to remove trees and vegetation from public land and <br />noted that it was strictly prohibited. That was one of three notices that were sent to this address. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked if they told him to remove the trees would they go back to all <br />of the other houses and tell them to remove their encroachments? <br />City Administrator Perrault said they would follow similar steps as this case if they had a <br />complaint. His guess was that if they tell him to remove the trees, someone will walk the trail and <br />let the City know about other violations. <br />Councilmember Rousseau preferred that he take out about half the trees and they come to some <br />other type of agreement with the other property owners. She thought they should tighten up what <br />they haven't done in the past but maybe not treat this issue and future issues in the same way. <br />Councilmember Holden said there are other issues by Cummings and Perry parks, fire pits <br />shouldn't be on City property. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe explained there was one notice that went to all <br />property owners along the trail that said the things they allow or do not allow on City property. <br />There was a second notice sent to this property owner based on a complaint to remove a fence. <br />The trees were put up and a third letter was sent telling him to remove the trees because he wasn't <br />allowed to plant on park property. <br />Councilmember Holden said it was a six-foot fence so he's just replacing it with vegetation. <br />Councilmember Monson there are people with more permanent issues on this trail. She didn't <br />want to spend the time to run down this landowner and then going to every landowner on the trail. <br />She felt they should decide what to do with this landowner and draw a line with a policy going <br />forward. It will be difficult to treat the past and the future equally. She thought they should just <br />snap the line and move on. <br />Councilmember Holden said they've made other people move fences when they encroached in <br />the past. <br />Councilmember Fabel thought if they had a red line, the City could say no, you can't encroach <br />on City property, get it off of there or we'll do it for you and charge you. That would be a clear <br />policy that staff would have no difficulty enforcing. <br />