Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> agencies. <br /> . MAY 16. 1990: The Committee reviewed current services provided by City staff and projected <br /> possible services which may be provided in the future. <br /> Park Director Buckley reported on discussions with staff at the University of Minnesota <br /> Extension Services Department and advised there does not appear to be an interest for utilizing <br /> shared facilities at this time. <br /> City staff provided the Committee with a list of deficiencies in the existing facilities for their <br /> review and future reference. <br /> Public Works Superintendent Winkel analyzed the advantages/disadvantages of a "stand-alone" <br /> Public Works Facility. <br /> JUNE 20 & 21. 1990: The Committee. along with various staff members. attended tours of <br /> recently constructed or newly-remodeled municipal facilities in this area. Tours included: Circle <br /> Pines. New Brighton. White Bear Lake and Shoreview. Representatives from each city were <br /> present to discuss the use of the facilities. pros and cons of the development and construction. <br /> and the financing used to complete construction. <br /> JULY 18. 1990: Administrator Berger and Public Works Superintendent Winkel discussed the <br /> existing City Hall and Public Works facilities as relates to current space/storage deficiencies and <br /> . future projected need for space/storage. <br /> Committee member Mike Olson volunteered to prepare an interim report of activities for Council <br /> review at their regular meeting held August 13. <br /> Members Brad Lemberg. Ward Sessing. Steve Erickson and Dennis Probst volunteered to serve <br /> on a subcommittee to review the structural integrity of the existing facilities. <br /> Administrator Berger advised he will provide the Committee with a copy of the results of the <br /> - - Citizens Survey at the October 1990 meeting. <br /> AUGUST 1990: No meeting held. <br /> SEPTEMBER 19. 1990: Planner Bergly appeared before the Committee to discuss potential City <br /> Hall sites and presented a site evaluation scheme example for committee review. <br /> The subcommittee reported on the structural integrity of the existing buildings and concluded that <br /> both buildings are highly deficient and noted lack of proper ventilation in the Public Works <br /> building and lack of energy efficient materials and deterioration of foundation materials in the <br /> City Hall building. <br /> . 3 <br /> f <br /> i <br /> ! <br /> ~-._- <br /> ------- <br />