Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council 2 April 27, 1992 <br /> <br />d. Adoption of Resolution No. 92-29 Providing for the <br />Issuance and Sale of Revenue Bond Pursuant to <br />Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as Amended, to <br />Provide Funds to be Loaned to Presbyterian Homes <br />of Minnesota, Inc. for Elderly Housing Project <br />e. Approve Solicitation Request from Minnesota Public <br />Lobby <br />f. Acknowledge Proclamation: Municipal Clerk's Week, <br />May 3 through May 9, 1992 <br />g. Approve List of Claims/Payroll <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> <br />There were no public comments. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR TILLER <br />LANE IMP~OVEMENT PROJECT <br /> <br />Mayor Sather opened the meeting at 7:37 p.m, for the purpose <br />of conducting an Assessment Hearing for Tiller Lane <br />Improvement Project. Acting Clerk Iago verified publication . <br />of the notice of hearing in the New Brighton Bulletin on <br />April 15, 1992 and mailing to affected property owners on <br />Apr~l 10, 1992. <br /> <br />City Engineer Maurer gave a brief overview of the Tiller <br />Lane Reconstruction project which includes reconstructing <br />Tiller Lane from Lexington Avenue to Hamline Avenue to a 30- <br />foot wide urban street with concrete curb and gutter with a <br />minor amount of utility improvements. Referring to his <br />April 20, 1992 report, he provided a breakdown of the <br />estimated costs presented at the February 10, 1992 public <br />hearing versus the actual low bid received. In summary, he <br />stated the total project cost (assuming award to the lowest <br />bidder) is $278,658.60 of which the amount to be paid by the <br />City is $143,127.96 and the amount to be assessed to <br />benefitting property owners is $135,530.64 at a rate of <br />$29.27 per front foot. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks asked why the City's share is slightly <br />more than 50% of the total project cost. Maurer responded <br />that the City is responsible for right~of-way costs which <br />are not assessable. <br /> <br />Acting Clerk 1ago stated that written comments were received <br />from three residents, two from 1158 and 1117 Tiller Lane . <br />which favor the project, and one from 1201 Tiller Lane which <br />indicates the street should only be overlayed. <br />