CCP 07-13-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

" , planning CoIIInission Meeting 2 7-01-92 PUBLIC HEroUNG - DEVELOPMENT MCRATClRIUM (CClNl'INUED) Member Dave Carlson expressed his support of the moratorium for a period . of 6 months instead of one year. 'Ihere was discussion of the length and contents of the moratorium and what is most beneficial to the public and the City. winiecki moved, Mo3raw seconded, to reconunend to Council to proceed with the moratorium for a period of one year. (Winiecki, Piotrowski, Probst, Mo3raw voting in favor; Carlson opposed) . (4-1) PUBLIC HEroUNG - ClISE #92-06: SUP AMENmENl' WITH V1lRIANCES. 1306 W. 00. RCliID E. 1\MJCO on. CCMP1\NY winiecki moved, seconded by piotrowski to reconsider Case #92-06, SUP Amendment with Variances, 1306 W. Co. Road E, Amoco Oil Company. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) . Chair Probst opened the public hearing at 7:49 p.m.; Case #92-06, SUP Amendment with Variances, 1306 W. Co. Road E, Amoco oil Colrg:lany. Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago confirmed the publication of the Notice of Hearing in the New BriQhton Bulletin and mailed to affected property owners on Wednesday, June 24. Planner Bergly referred to his report dated 7-01-92, and explained the Amoco request was thoroughly discussed at the June 3 Planning Cormnission . meeting . Options discussed were for a car wash location to the rear and west end of the building, and a proposal for the east end. 'Ihe Applicant requested approval = denial of the application as suhnitted without considering the options. Action to deny the request was to be sent to the Council. The Applicant suhnitted a request that the Case be pulled fram the Council agenda to provide additional time to view an optional plan. 'Ihe Planner reviewed the findings listed in his report and stated since the June meeting, the Applicant, the Architect, Chainnan Probst and the Planner have reviewed a revised scheme that addresses most of the concerns of the Planning Conunission. The key issues discussed were: 1. Intensitv: '[Wo setback variances were requested to squeeze the building, drives and parking onto an already heavily used site. Response: The revised Plan has the new building to the southwest of the existing station; the traffic patterrl proceeds clcx::kwise around the rear of the station, into the carwash and exits on the west drive that connects the restaurant to County Road E. The drive and building are depressed approximately 3 feet =eating a lower profile building situated to the rear of the site. 2. Concrestion: Traffic cirCUlating to and from the carwash cut directly through the already congested site. Response: The new Plan brings all carwash traffic around the south and west ends of the site - existing from the west drive . directly to County Road E.