CCP 09-14-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

pll'lnn;'Iq o."''';Rl'Jion Meeting 4 9-02-92 ~ Cl\SE #92-16: SITE PLl\N REVIE.W. 1160 WEST COtlNl'Y R07lD E. JOE caemRS (OWNER) (Continued) : winiecki opposed) . (3-2). . 'lhe suhT\ission for full project shall include all infonnation outlined in the Ordinance for site Plan Review. Chair Prowt informed the Applicant that although Mr. Camners may be:Jin the necessary site work after Council approval, the Conunission has not recormnended a final site plan approval and that it will be subject to the Conunission review and approval of proposed i1rprovements to the J:cilding . He expressed his concern regarding the lack of suhT\ission of materials for the site Plan Review which was begun this evening. Chair Prol:st explained that the Conunission would prefer to retain the opportunity to review and make reconunendation to Council on the J:cilding and site plan. Winiecki noted that it appears Conunission has lost the opportunity to review circulation on site by approving the site improvements, i.e.; installation of the utilities and demolition of a portion of the J:cilding . Chair Prowt indicated there are no other options for circulation on this site, unless the City chooses to get involved in the acquisition of access to the easterly adjacent site. McGraw moved, Erickson seconded, to waive the Development . Moratorium for Case #92-16, site Plan Review, 1160 West County Road E, Joe Commers (OWner). Motion carried (Prowt, McGraw, Erickson voting in favor; Carlson and winiecki opposed). (3-2). DISCUSSICti: 0l'HER l'Ll\NNIH; ISSUES (CXIlrINUED) PrOPOSed DevelOPIllel'lt of Bethel Colleoe site West of Snellim. PrOPOSed by Good Value Homes: Mr. John Peterson, vice President of Good Value Homes, stated Good Value Homes is in the process of negotiating with Bethel College for the acquisition of a 10-a=e parcel near Chatham Avenue. He stated they are in the preliminary stages of developing approxlinately 36 townhome units (2 t~omes per unit), 1,200 sq.ft. and above per unit, and valued at $100,000 to $130,000 per unit. Mr. Peterson asked the Conunission about their opinions to the development and affects, if any, to the neighborhood. Mr. Dan O:jren, El:iina Realty, stated the density would be 5 to 6 units per a=e and indicated support of this type of development in Arden Hills. He indicated there is a strong market for townhouse development. Erickson questioned the possibility of rezoning the land to R-3 since there is a development moratorium inposed at this time. . Planning Conunission encouraged the Applicant to consider single family development.