My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-14-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 09-14-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:55 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:39:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Arden Hills Counci 1 8 August 31, 1992 . <br />being done to side step any liability issue, but rather this <br />project was always intended. Regarding the issue of funding <br />the project, Filla reminded that the City at large will pay <br />the majority of the project and there are no other known <br />means. Filla added that if the City did pursue the <br />developer, anything recovered could theoretically be applied <br />to the City's portion rather than decrease individual <br />assessments. <br />Kurt Lawrence said the developer, at one time, planned to <br />improve the pond, but the City said it was not needed. <br />Graham stated that not having been involved at that time, he <br />does not know what actually took place. Fi 11 a stated that <br />the City has never said this pond or the pond outlet was not <br />needed. Councilmember Hicks added that in conversing with <br />the former City engineer, they also have no recollection of <br />discouraging the developer from improving the pond. Dick <br />Foster explained there was once a pIpe from the street to <br />the old pond which was removed, <br />Ma,gs.rs!Tredal Obiection - 4521 Keithson: Hark Hagel's stated <br />that in 1989, he called the former engineer and Mayor Sather <br />to review the concerns of the Keithson properties; several <br />meetings took place, but the developer had no plan to . <br />address the problems then; now the developer is no longer <br />involved and more time has elapsed. He said that when the <br />City Engineer released the bond, the drainage issue was not <br />resolved. Fi 11 a commented that an outlet to the Reil ing <br />property was always intended and now the City is taking <br />action to obtain the easement for the ou tl e t through <br />condemnation proceedings. Filla added that Rice Creek <br />Watershed District approved the drainage plans assuming an <br />outlet would be added sometime in the future. <br />Toni Tredal said she has a copy of the Rice Creek Watershed <br />D~strict permit spelling out the conditions the developer <br />was requi.;:ed t.o meet, but the developer did not complete any <br />or the conditions, She st.ated that she is offended by <br />Councilmember Hicks earlier comment.s beca\l;;e Magers/Tredal <br />have spent very much time trying to deal with this ma t t e;: , <br />p, n d~_t:~Qll_.nJ2i?~.tj.s~~-=_ 4522 Keithson: James Anderson asked <br />why t.he Reiling property is not proposed to be assessed_ <br />Graham stated that the Reiling property is adequate to hold <br />i.ts C:"...Jfl drainage, part of the pond is locat.ed on the Reiling <br />property, and Mr. Reiling has not granted an easement or <br />donated his property to contain drainage from other <br />properties <br />Foster Ob'iection - 4527 Keithson: Dick Foster commented . <br />that the Reiling property drains more into the pond than any <br />other property in the area. He questioned whether the City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.