My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-14-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 09-14-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:55 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:39:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ;.!t <br />. Arden Hills Council <br /> 9 August 31, 1992 <br /> is bargaining with Mr. Reiling. Filla stated that so far <br /> there has been no negotiation with Mr. Reiling to make a <br /> trade of assessment for property or any similar agreements. <br /> Filla stated that it is the City's hope that the layout of <br /> the pond will benefit the Reiling property to a degree that <br /> Mr. Reiling may cooperate and the City can reduce its <br /> exposure to compensate Reiling for intrusion on his <br /> property. Filla added that if the Reiling property were to <br /> be assessed, assessment hearings would need to be <br /> reconducted. <br /> Filla referred to Dick Foster's objection in the Summary and <br /> Response document that if the Reilin9 property had been <br /> developed at the same time as the Keithson development, the <br /> cost of this improvement would be less. Filla commented <br /> that this may be true, but Mr. Reiling did not wish to <br /> develop his property at that time. <br /> Dick Foster commented that if the City had taken action a <br /> few years ago by digging the existing pond deeper, problems <br /> could have been corrected then. Filla reiterated that Mr. <br />. Reiling has never agreed to grant an easement to allow the <br /> City to do so; if he had, the City would have taken action <br /> earlier. Fi 11 a added, however, that assessments would have <br /> been supportable in that scenario. <br /> Hill Obiection - 4528 Keithson: Regarding Hills objection <br /> on the premise that this project benefits the entire <br /> community, Filla stated he agreed and that is why the City <br /> at large will be absorbing such a large share of the costs. <br /> He added that certain properties, those proposed to be <br /> specially assessed, receive additional benefit. <br /> Giel Obiection - 4534 Keithson: Teresa Giel stated her <br /> comments have already been answered this evening, but she <br /> was offended by some Council comments earlier this evening. <br /> Lawyer Obiection - 4539 Keithson: Filla stated this <br /> objection has already been covered this evening. <br /> stennes Obiection - 4540 Keithson: Filla referred to <br /> stennes' objection that the majority of the stennes property <br /> does not drain into the pond and therefore does not receive <br /> benefit. Filla explained that Council determined that 25% <br /> of the stennes property drains to Keithson Pond, therefore <br /> the owner would be assessed 25% of the maximum supportable <br /> per lot assessment. ~; <br />. 11 <br /> ,;I <br /> Attorney Filla recommended that the July 27, 1992 Summary :i <br /> *1 <br /> and Response document and the videotape recording of this f;t <br /> evening's meeting be preserved for at least 90 days. The i <br /> public hearing was closed at 9:47 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.