Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, . <br /> MINUTES OF THE ARDEN HILLS l'L1INNIm <:nIMISSION MEE:l'Im <br />. ~Y, JUNE 3, 1992, 7:30 P.M. - CITY HALL <br /> ClU.oL TO C1IU>ER: <br /> Chair Probst called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. <br /> ROLL ClU.oL: <br /> Present: Chair Dennis Probst, Members Dave Carlson, Barbara PiotrCMSki, steve <br /> Edckson, Jeanne w:iniecki, Scott Petersen and Council Liaison '!homas Mahowald. <br /> Absent: Member Raymond Mo3raw. Also present: Planner John Bergly, Acting Clerk <br /> Administrator Catherine Iago, and Recording Secretary Tery Shields. <br /> APPROVE MINUTES: <br /> Petersen nnved, seconded by Erickson, to approve the May 6, 1992, Planning <br /> Minutes as sul:mitted. All voted in favor. (6-0) <br /> PUBLIC JIElUUK; - Cl\SE #92-06: SUP 1\MENI:MEIfi WITH VARIANCES. 1306 W. CO. ROllI> E. <br /> AKJCO OIL cx:MPANY: <br /> Chair Probst opened the meeting at 7:32 p.m. for the purpose of a public hearing <br /> on Case #92-06, SUP Amendment with variances, 1306 W. Co. Road E, Amoco oil <br /> Conpmy. <br />. Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago confirmed the publication of the <br /> Notice of Hearing in the New Briohton Bulletin on Wednesday, May 20, and miling <br /> to affected property owners on Tuesday, May 19. <br /> Plarmer Bergly referred to his report dated 6-03-92, and eJq:llained the applicant <br /> proposes to amend SUP 86-27, to allow the present car wash to be converted into <br /> a third service bay, and anew, enlarged car wash to be attached to the east side <br /> of the existing structure. The application also requires granting a 10-foot side <br /> yard variance frOll1 the east property line, twenty feet is required for a <br /> _principal building and 10 feet is proposed. '!he variance would be frOll1 the <br /> requlations listed in Sec. VI, C, (2), (a), 3., of the Zoning Code, which <br /> requires a minimum of 15 feet for a rear yard landscape area. <br /> The Planner reviewed the history of SUP 86-27 that allowed the present car wash <br /> and required miscellaneous site i1rq:lrovements. '!he present application needs to <br /> address the following issues: <br /> 1. Does the conversion of the existing car wash into a service bay and the <br /> addition of a new car wash make the use too intense for the site? <br /> 2. Have all the conditions of the 86-27 SUP been addressed? <br /> 3. Are there alternatives that do not require the side yard and landscaped <br /> rear yard variances proposed? <br /> 4. will parking provided be adequate for the expanded use? <br /> 5. will the circulation pattern add to the on-site congestion or help <br /> minimize it? <br />. <br />