CCP 06-08-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Minutes of the Arden Hills RegUlar Planning cnnni"'sion Meeting, 6-03-92 PageS CASE #92-06 (calI"D): Member Carlson state::! his =ncerns relating to the intensity of use of the station. He suggested Amoco oil Corrq:lany and the city meet to discuss the development of the lot. Chair Probst asked if there was anyone present to speak in favor of or opposed to this matter. Hearing no response, the public hearing was closed at 8:25 p.m. Petersen moved, seconded by piotrowski that Carmnission recommend to Council denial of Case #92-06i SUP Amendment with variance, 1306 W. Co. Road E, Amoco oil CcnIpany, as suhnitte::! with Option A, based on the fact there does not appear to be an identifiable hardship to warrant the variance request. Motion carried unanilrously. (6-0) PUBLIC HEARING: CASE #92-11: tll'=.ulL USE PERMIT. 1212 RED FOX ROAD. TWIN CITY PET SUPPLY CO.. ~.: Chair Probst opened the meeting at 8:25 p.m. for the purpose of a public hearing on Case #92-11, Special Use pennit to allow sale of pet supplies, club meetings, . pet seminars and dog training in the B-4 District, 1212 Red Fox Road, Twin city Pet SUpply Co., Inc. Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago =nfll:med the publication of the Notice of Hearing in the New Briahton Bulletin on Wednesday, May 20, and mailing to affected property avners on Tuesday, May 19, 1992. Plarmer Bergly reviewed his report date::! June 3, 1992, relating to Special Use Pennit to allow dog training in the B-4 District, 1212 Red Fox Road, Twin city Pet SUpply Co., Inc. - Bergly explained that the Applicant has requeste::! a proposed use not liste::! as a pennitte::! use = use by Special Use Pennit in the list of District uses. He state::! the Zoning Ordinance (Section V, C) provides a means whereby the Carmnission and Council can determine whether it falls within a pennitte::! or Special Use category. The Carmnission reviewed this issue at the May 6 meeting and recommended it be treate::! as a Special Use requiring a Special Use Pennit. The Planner reviewed the background of the Applicant's request and state::! that parking is more than adequate and no site plan or exteri= building changes are proposed. He further state::! this would qualify as a transitional use even if the uses were not pennitted in the new B-4 District but pennitte::! in the previous 1-2 District. Bergly reviewed the findings liste::! in his report and state::! that this issue is . a use where no single use is predominant and no single use is clearly accessory. He state::! the training area is the only segment of the use that would not be =nsidered a pennitte::! use in the B-4 District.