My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-15-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 06-15-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:07 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:39:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> PAl 612 487 2083 lJaly!< & Wiseman l.Q'JlllltJ <br /> 06/121lI2 12::n <br /> After the December, 1990 city Council approval, I spent <br /> . approximately $35,000.00 between December or 1990 and December of <br /> 1-991. These expenses were in the form of carrying expenses for <br /> debt, architect=al expenses, expenses accrued by the City <br /> processing with their engineers and other staff, Rice Creek <br /> Water-shed District approval, and procedures for securing <br /> financing. <br /> In December of 1991, I made formal application for an <br /> extension as per city direction. I was told by Kathy Iago that <br /> my written request must be submitted at least three days prior to <br /> the December 30th city Council Meeting. I submitted my written <br /> request on December 1-5, 1991- Just prior to the Council meeting, <br /> for Which my site plan was SCheduled for review, I was contacted <br /> . by John Bergly with an alternative suggestion of simply <br /> "suspending" the site plan. That was the term he used; <br /> "suspending" . He stated the Council would not act on it either <br /> way; neither approve or deny it. It would simply be carried in a <br /> "suspendedR state until I could receive financing. <br /> There were two other projects in a very similar situation <br /> and his suggestion was baSed on the fact that the city did not <br /> want to 'spend time and money approving site plan extensions for <br /> which financing may not be avaiLwle. This made sense from my <br /> point of view, in that my project was similarly situated. Mr. <br /> Bergly stated that once approval was obtained, the site plan <br /> could simply be "reinstated", and I could proceed on with the <br /> project from where I had left off and not have to "reapply". <br /> . <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.