My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-15-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 06-15-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:07 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:39:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> 4:!:jl)\)/ <br /> -- - -. -...- ....;~~II..~ ~.. .,.....>'-''''.....u <br /> His suggestion made sense to me. He stated he would handle <br /> . the withdrawal of my formal extension request. Therefore, I did <br /> not go to the December 30, 1991 Council meeting. In the <br /> following three months I spent approximately another $7,000.00, <br /> mostly in the form of charges for debt previously incurred and in <br /> costs incurred in continuing to seek financing. <br /> In April of 1991, I received a letter of commitment from a <br /> commercial lender in the amount I deemed necessary to proceed <br /> with the project. I notified Kathy lago at the city of Arden <br /> Hills that I was ready to get a building permit. Kathy rago said <br /> the proj ect would be put on the June 3, 1992 Planning CommiSsion <br /> agenda. I was surprised to hear that I would have to go back to <br /> the Planning CommiSSion, because I was simply extending site plan <br /> approval. This did not make sense to me, because had I extended <br /> . site plan approval in December of 1991, instead of "suspending" <br /> it as John Bergly suggested, I would not have been scheduled for <br /> Planning Commission review in December of 1991. still, I had no <br /> reason to believe that there would be any problem. Nobody from <br /> the Planning Commission mentioned any problems or concerns with <br /> the project. <br /> I even talked with Dale HiCks, on approximately May 18, <br /> 1991, in regard to Park Dedication Requirements, as that is one <br /> of the items I needed to complete prior to the issuance of a <br /> building permit, and he did not mention that there were any <br /> problems. I came to the conclusion that I could proceed as <br /> indicated by City employees without any problems; and committed <br /> . another $16,000.00, mostly in the form of loan commitment fees, <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.