CCP 11-09-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. pl,nminq n.....;..8ion Meeting 5 11-04-92 Cl\SE #92-19: WAIVER OF ~ CIlD:IN1lH::B: 2020 'l'JI[J{ IRIVE. CMEN ~ . 7. '!he proposed garage will help to reduce the I-35 traffic noise ilrpact on the Applicant's backyard. 8. '!he en:i of the structure facing 'lhcm Drive will be a fairly st:.aroard garage width of 24 feet. 'Ihe 40 foot depth will not be evident from 'Ihan Drive. 9. A 30 ft. x 48 ft. (1440 sf) 21 ft. high steel pole blildi:ng is located on the lot immediately west of the subject lot. For ~rison, the proposed structure will be 24 ft. x 40 ft. (960 sf) and 10 ft. high on the eave line. 10. '!he roof of the structure will be the same =lor as the roof an the house, and the exterior walls will be lighter than the house but in a similar =lor. P!armer Bergly reccmnen:ied the follOlo1ing action: 'lhat the waiver of the Moratorium be approved to allOlo1 =nstruction of a garage that would be allCMed umer the existing Ordinance for the reasons stated in the above fi.rrlirYos. winiecki requested the re=rding secretary incorporate into the record, the letter of objection received fran Dana Souther, 2018 'Ihan Drive, dated November 3, 1992. Carol Fischer, =-owner of the property at 2020 'Ihom Drive responded to the letter from Souther by advising Canunission of several neighborhood . disputes with this person. Fischer noted that the letter did not appear to be objecting to the garage, but objecting to the overall developnent of this site. Zoning Administrator advised Canunission that aocecsory blildi:ng IIIUSt be setback 10 feet fram the rear property line and 5 feet fram the side property line in an R-2 district. She noted the plan showed the setbacks reversed and asked the Applicant if these requirements could be met for placement of the structure. OWen Rasl\IUSSeI1 agreed to place the structure 10 feet fram both the rear and side property lines. Petersen moved, seconied by Piotrowski, to recornmerxi to Council approval of Case #92-19, Waiver of the Development Moratorium Ordinance to allow =nstruction of a garage umer the existing Ordinance based on the reasons outlined in the Planner's report dated 11/4/92. Motion passed. (4-1). (Petersen, Piotrowski, McGraw and Carlson voting in favor; winiecki opposed). Cl\SE #92-20. SIDE Y1lRD Sm'BlICK VARI1lR::E Pm IJIiELLIlI; EXPANSICfi. 1727 CIIM'ImM AVENllE. RICK AND SHmlILDl JmNSCfi Planner Bergly referred to his report of November 4, 1992, and explained the Applicant is requesting a variance fran the required 10 foot side yard in the R-1 District to allow the dwelling to be expanded to be . within 6 feet of the lot line. A 4 foot side yard variance is therefore required.