CCP 11-09-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

p'..nni"')' ~.....i_ion Meeting 4 11-04-92 Cl\SE #92-17: REZC:1mI; AND PLl\!lNED tlmT DE'lELCll'MDlr. CLEVELl\ND AVIHlE. .:JaIN ARXELL (continued) '!he Applicant does not discriminate as to where a hanlicap resident . would like to live, therefore all units are hanlicap adaptable. Carlson moved, seconded by McGraw, to waive the Develcpnent Moratorium Ordinance. All voted in favor. (5-0). i McGraw moved, secon::led by Petersen to Rezone the pIUl=Ly iran R-2 to R-3 upon issuance of a bJildin;J permit for the p1:0p0sed PUD with a density of 6.5 units per a=e as allowed in the proposed Zonin;J Ordinance revisions. All voted in favor. (5-0). Carlson moved, secon::led by McGraw to recommerrl to O::Juncil awroval of Case #92-17, PUD General Development Plan arx:l Final Plan for the Cottage Villas of Arden Hills with conditions A thru G outlined urxler #3 of the Planner's report dated November 4, 1992, arx:l further conditions as follows: 1) the three items listed in the Fire Marshall's memo of November 4, 1992 to Catherine Iage relatin:J to sprinklin:J the bJildin;J arx:l the fire access road; 2) that a b.ls shelter be provided for residents of the c:c:mplex; 3) that a congregate area be established in one of the courtyards in lieu of the area shown in the circular drive; arx:l 4) that the lot stakes be replaced at the residence of Elizabeth Modesette, 3743 New Brighton Rd at the expense of the applicant. All voted in favor. (5-0). Cl\SE #92-19. WAIVER OF JDmTClUUM ClIDI:NlIN:::E: 2020 '1'fI[M IRIVE. OWEN Rl\SMIJSSEN . Planner Bergly referred to his report dated November 4, 1992, arx:l explained that the Applicant is requesting' that the MoratoriUlll Ordinance be waived to allCM him to construct a 24' x 40' (960 sf) garage/storage bJilcli.rq that is allowed un:l.er the present Ordinance. Bergly reviewed the fin:lings listed in his report: 1. The present Ordinance does not limit the size of such aocessory bJildings . 2. The 1-"-~ Ordinance, as revised at a recent Planning Camnission meetin:J, would limit such accessory buildin;Js to a maximum size of 700 sq. ft. 3. The Applicant's lot is located in a small neighbortlood with smaller, lower value homes, many with considerable outdoor storage. 4. '!he Applicant's lot is 20,000 sq. ft., considerably larger than the 11,000 sq. ft. allowed in the R-2 District so the ratio of the garage to the lot will be similar to a starnard lot with a staOOard garage. 5. '!he Applicant's new home is considerably larger than other homes in the neighborhcxxi. '!he larger detached a=essory buildin;J was planned as part of the original development arx:l to be consistent with the existin:J Ordinance. '!he garage is staked out arx:l =ushed rock base is in place as well as a =ushed rock drive next to the house . '!he applicant was unaware of the MoratoriUlll Ordinance . until he applied for a a bJildin;J permit for the garage. 6. '!he proposed garage is needed to house two collector cars (now stored in the attached garage) arx:l miscellaneous material arx:l equipment IlCM stored outdoors.