My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-30-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 11-30-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:17 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:40:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br /> <br />. Arden Hills Council 3 November 9, 1992 <br /> <br />Larson requested that 1) The valuation of $9,000 for the <br />remodeling be accepted or an unbiased neighboring City <br />review the matter, 2) A neutral party be allowed to inspect <br />the remodeling, and 3) The City establish a written, <br />consistent procedure and guidelines for determining <br />valuation to make the building permit process more "user <br />friendly". He added that he believes most people don't even <br />apply for permits for this type of remodeling. <br /> <br />Administrator Person said staff is attempting to arrive at a <br />figure that is appropriate and mutually agreeable, but that <br />figure must be based upon unbiased facts rather than simply <br />an arbitrary compromise. She agreed that a written policy <br />and appropriate formulas for determining valuation should be <br />established. Person commented that if Larson could submit <br />estimates from independent contractors, those estimates <br />would be helpful in determining valuation so this matter <br />could be settled relatively soon, with a written policy <br />addressing the issue to be established later. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks referred to the dispute over whether the <br />space is a basement or a story and asked the current <br />. condition of the space. Larson replied that the area is the <br />totally enclosed, lower level of a split entry home which <br />has already had plumbing and electricity installed from the <br />original construction, Hicks stated that the Building <br />Inspector's original figure of $26,113.05 may be correct for <br />original construction, but when a space is changed from <br />unfinished to finished, it seems appropriate that <br />calculations be based upon a different formula. <br /> <br />Hicks added that he trusts staff will be able to settle the <br />issue. Councilmember Malone agreed that it appears staff is <br />attempting to resolve this issue and he preferred to let <br />that process continue. council encouraged Larson to <br />continue to work with staff toward a resolution. <br /> <br />UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />CASE NO. 92-17 <br />REZONE & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT <br />COTTAGE VILLAS OF ARDEN HILLS <br />JOHN ARKELL, DEVELOPER <br /> <br />City Planner Bergly reported that the applicant in Case No. <br />92-17, developer John Arke11, is proposing a 60-unit senior <br />housing development for persons 60 years of age and over in <br />the income level of $24,500 and under. The highlights of <br />. the project include: affordability, handicap adaptability, <br />on-site caretaker, meal program, area hospital visits, <br />van/taxi/bus transportation, we11ness program, and social <br />events. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.