My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-30-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 11-30-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:17 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:40:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> . <br /> . <br /> Arden Hills Council 4 November 9, 1992 <br /> Bergly outlined the boundaries of the property proposed to <br /> be purchased and the portion of that property which is <br /> proposed to be developed. He noted that the proposal calls <br /> for a two-story complex with garages. He reported that the <br /> Fire Marshall has indicated that fire hydrants should be <br /> relocated on this property and the entire building be <br /> sprinkled in lieu of a circumferential drive around the <br /> building. <br /> Bergly stated that the plans call for a bus shelter to be <br /> located at the entrance of the development if bus service <br /> routes can be revised to service that location. Bergly also <br /> stated that outdoor congregate seating areas are planned in <br /> the courtyards of the complex. <br /> Bergly noted that one issue at the Planning Commission level <br /> was the matter of signage for the project. He reported that <br /> a satisfactory sign location has now been established which <br /> meets setback requirements, and the project's identification <br /> sign has now been designed to conform to the sign ordinance <br /> relative to size, height, and construction. <br /> Bergly reported that suggestions made by the Planning . <br /> Commission were taken under advisement by the developer and <br /> changes have been made to address Planning Commission <br /> concerns. He added that while the proposal generally <br /> conforms to the comprehensive plan and technical matters <br /> under both the existing ordinance and the proposed revised <br /> ordinance, it would require: <br /> 1) Waiving of the Development Moratorium, <br /> 2) Rezoning from R-2 to R-3 to accommodate the proposed <br /> density of approximately 6 and 2/3 units per acre, and <br /> 3) Approval of the PUD General Development Plan. <br /> Councilmember Hicks recalled that originally about 12 acres <br /> were being considered for this project and now there is a 9 <br /> acre site. Bergly explained the boundaries of the building <br /> site as well as the entire property the developer is <br /> purchasing. <br /> councilmember Hicks asked what amount of regrading would be <br /> necessary to accommodate this project. Bergly stated the <br /> only grading planned is to create a ponding area, and <br /> explained that surface water run-off would flow through <br /> storm sewer to the ponding area. He added that the contours <br /> shown on the map around the rear of the proposed complex <br /> already exist and will require very minor regrading. He . <br /> pointed out that along the north portion of the property a <br /> very small area would be filled and a small wetland would be <br /> added. He confirmed that a water management plan must be <br /> approved by Rice Creek watershed District, the DNR, and Army <br /> ---- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.