CCP 12-14-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Ocmnission Meeting 4 12-02-92 Erickson requested Planner Bergly clarify the stonn drainage ani public . easements. Bergly did so and also referred to Engineer Mark Graham I S letter of November 25 which is included in the Planner I s report of December 2, 1992. Mr. Graham recommends that an easement be delineated arcll.Ini these porrls which meets the requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District. Mr. Graham felt it is =nceivable that the pond on Parcel B nay be illpacted by development. 'Ihese porrls do not appear to be protected wetlands, but this should be verified by Control Data ani shown on the plat. winiecki moved, secon:ied by Petersen, to recommen:i to Council awroval of Case #92-21, lDt Consolidation ani Minor SUb:livision, with con:iitions 2 thru 5 outlined under the recommendations in the Planner I S report of December 2, 1992, with clarification that the wetlani easements are to =nform with Rice Creek Watershed District requirements ani that utility easements are to be =nforming with the requirements of the City Engineer. DISCtlSSION: 0l'HER PLl'lNNIm ISSUES Zoning Administrat= Iage discussed a request from Scherer Bros. I.umber to begin work on the J:::uild.i.n3' foundation in =njunction with a prq>osed addition to their existing facilities, prior to site Plan Review by Planning Canmission ani Council. Iago reported that this type of request occurs frequently when applicants miss deadlines for subnission; it was suggested that Commission consider a provision f= a "Special Meeting". Iago indicated she would =tact other cammunities to obtain infonnation regarding this process. . DISCUSSION OF l'RuJ:outn!;u IIlAFT OF SIGN CIlD:INlIN::E: As Olair Probst had not previously seen the prq>osed draft, he asked. Carlson to comment on the naj= charxJes. Carlson rep:lrted the following: * The biggest charxJe related to the issue of illumination. Council suggested adding Holograms to the section relating to sign movement; intent to prohibit signs where the otserver detects movement. * On Page 2 (d) add reflected by light. Bergly commented the setback for l:usinesses was charxJed from 25 feet to 20 feet because of the park.in;r setback. Commission requested. the Planner insert modifications f= Council review in the next agenda packet. Commission requested further direction fran Council ani comments on the proposed Sign Ordinance. ~ REI!CRl' Councill11ember Hicks infonned. the Commission of the results of the Referendum ani Council discussion relating to the options being considered for J:::uild.i.n3' a new City Hall/Public Works facility. He noted the City continues to negotiate for the arsenal property between Hamline and Lexington Avenue for these facilities. Hicks commented on possible reasons f= the bond referendum failure. .