CCP 12-14-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

planninq n"''';''5ion Meet.:il!q 3 12-02-92 . Bergly noted that Control Data Systems is advising the proposed purchaser that Park dedication fees will be required f= any development that occurs on this site. He noted on camnercial sites usually Park Dedication is attached to an awlication f= development rather than as part of the platting = lot division action. Bergly explained that street right-of-way is irrlicated by a dashed line on the plat, b.1t is not included in the property des=iptions. '!here are cu=ently easements provided for the aJ::utting streets. '!hese should be shown as right-of-way dedication on the plat am not included as part of the lots. Planner Bergly recamnended the following actions: 1- '!hat the proposed division be prepared in the form of a Final Plat for signatures by the City am filin:J with the County. 2. Parcels A, B, am C shall not include the RCM of abutting streets either in the delineation on the plat = in the legal des=iption. 3. utility arrl Drainage Easements shall be shown on the plat. 4. Wetlands shall be delineated on the plat in a=dance with a qualified wetlarrl delineator arrl RC.WD regulations. 5. Park dedication fees shall be resolved either in the platting stage or as part of the Development AyLeement. Chair Probst asked Jon Peterson, Towle Real Estate agent representing Control Data, if there is a need for access by a private street. Mr. Peterson . irrlicated there is no need f= an access easement with this proposal. Mr. Peterson introduced Lloyd Pew, the surveyor arrl asked Mr. Pew to speak. Mr. Pew stated as there are no development issues at this t:i1ne arrl no proposal to alter anything, theref=e, all issues relatin:J to development of this parcel should be deferred until a plan is suJ:mitted. He stated the applicant is requesting to clean up the legal des=iptions arrl file a deed at Ramsey County . winiecki stated the issue of the r~ed easements should be addressed arrl questioned the a=acy of the survey. Mr. Pew stated the survey is cu=ent. Petersen questioned the t:i1ne differential between processin:J a plat arrl min= sub-division. Mr. Pew stated it may require up to 3 months to process a plat versus filing a deed within one month. Winiecki questioned the hardship of the short t:i1ne frame involved for these des=iption changes. Walt Seiler, Control Data Facility Manager, spoke arrl stated that Control Data systems, Inc. is in no way affiliated with Control Data Corp. am they became a new corporate entity this summer. Mr. Seiler stated the sale of this property in the first quarter of 1993, would provide the company the opportunity to show a profit in lieu of a short fall. Mr. Seiler introduced the c:anpmy attorney, Jim Bellarrli. Mr. Bellandi stated he spoke with Attomey Filla this afternoon to discuss the platting recornmendation. He stated that durin:J discussions with Attorney Filla, it was . his understanding that a revised legal description would be in compliance with city regulations since this is an application for a minor suJ:rlivision.