CCP 12-14-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Pl ,,1m h'lq n ..... i Asion Meetillq 4 12-02-92 Erickson requested Planner Bergly clarify the storm drainage am public . easements . Bergly did so am also referred to Engineer Mark Graham's letter of November 25 which is included in the Planner r s report of December 2, 1992. Mr. Graham recxmunends that an easement be delineated around these porx:ls which meets the requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District. Mr. Graham felt it is conceivable that the porrlon Parcel B may be ilnpacted by development. These ponds do not appear to be protected wetlands, J:ut this should be verified by Control Data am shown on the plat. Winiecki moved, secorrled by Petersen, to recommend to Council approval of Case #92-21, lDt Consolidation am Minor Subdivision, with conditions 2 thru 5 outlined un:l.er the recommendations in the Planner's report of December 2, 1992, with clarification that the wetlam easements are to conform with Rice Creek Watershed District requirements am that utility easements are to be confonning with the requirements of the City Engineer. DISCUSSICti: 01'HER PLl\NNnlG :ISSUES Zoning Administrator Iago discussed a request from Scherer Bros. Lumber to begin work on the bJilding foun::lation in conjunction with a propooed addition to their existing facilities, prior to site Plan Review by Planning Cormnission am Council. Iago reported that this type of request occurs frequently when applicants miss deadlines for suhnission; it was suggested that Cormnission consider a provision f= a "Special Meeting". rago indicated she would contact other COIlUllUI1i.ties to obtain information regarding this process. . DISCUSSICti OF PROkU:lJ:iU IE\Fl' OF SIGN alDrNl\N::E: As Chair Prol:st had not previously seen the proposed draft, he asked Carlson to comment on the maj= changes. Carlson reported the following: * The biggest change related to the issue of illumination. Council suggested adding Holograms to the section relating to sign movement; intent to prohibit signs where the otserver detects movement. * On Page 2 (d) add reflected by light. Bergly commented the setback for businesses was changed from 25 feet to 20 feet because of the parking setback. Cormnission requested the Planner insert m:xtifications for Council review in the next agenda packet. Cormnission requested further direction from Council am comments on the propooed Sign Ordinance. CXJUN::rL REPCRl' Council1nember Hicks informed the Cormnission of the results of the Referenchnn am Council discussion relating to the options being considered for J:uilding a new City Hall/Public Works facility. He noted the City continues to negotiate for the arsenal property between Hamline am Lexington Avenue f= these facilities. Hicks commented on possible reasons for the bom referendum failure. .