Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> , <br /> , <br /> . <br />Arden Hills Council 2 December 14, 1992 <br />CONSENT CALENDAR <br />MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to approve the Consent <br /> Calendar and authorize execution of all necessary <br /> documents contained therein. Motion carried <br /> unanimously (5-0) . <br /> a. Adopt Resolution No. 92-74 Relating to <br /> Apportionment of Assessments Relating to <br /> Improvement No. ST-81-2. <br /> b. Approve Pay Estimate #2 for 1992 Keithson Pond <br /> Improvements. <br /> c. Approve Purchase from 1992 Budget - Computer PC <br /> Workstation. <br /> d. Receive November 1992 Financial statement. <br /> e. Approve 1993 Liquor License Renewals. <br /> f. Approve Request for Funds - state Aid Allotment. <br /> g. Approve Authorization of Contract with Abdo, Abdo <br /> & Eick as 1993 City Auditor. <br /> h. Approve the Award of Quotes - Rodder Equipment and <br /> l-Ton Truck Equipment (Plow and Sander) to <br /> Flexible Pipe Tool Co. for $19,890.00. <br /> i. Approve List of Claims/Payroll. . <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />ALTERNATIVES FOR T.H. 51/SNELLING <br />Jean Lemberg, l401 Skiles Lane, commented that she has <br />learned there has been some public expression of opposition <br />to one of the alternatives for opening the T.H. 5l/Snelling <br />intersection. She said she is aware of many residents who <br />support the opening of the intersection with signalization <br />but have not written letters expressing their support; she <br />asked if Council would like to receive letters from those <br />supporters. <br />Administrator Person reported that recently three letters <br />regarding this issue. Councilmember Hicks commented that he <br />would be interested in knowing the desires of the residents <br />in the area. Councilmember Malone reminded that in earlier <br />discussions of this issue, both sides were represented, so <br />Council is aware that there is not unanimous agreement on <br />this issue. Malone added that when he reviews letters from <br />the public, he views such letters as indicative of the <br />position of the writer{ s) only, regardless of whether the <br />letter may state that the view expressed reflects the view <br />of an entire neighborhood or group. . <br />