My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 12-21-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 12-21-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:19 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:40:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> Arden Hills Council 3 December 14, 1992 <br /> UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> CASE #92-21 - MINOR <br /> SUBDIVISION/LOY CONSOLIDATION <br /> ~ONTROL DATA SYSTEMS <br /> City Planner Bergly explained that Control Data Systems is <br /> requesting approval to consolidate parcels which they own <br /> and then subdivide the consolidated property into three <br /> parcels. He outlined the boundaries of the subject parcel, <br /> and boundaries and ownership of adjacent properties. <br /> Bergly stated that the lot consolidation/minor subdivision <br /> would create parcels A, B, and C. He added that parcel A is <br /> the NSP substation, parcel B would be the combination of two <br /> parcels into a long, rectangular developable lot (for which <br /> there is already a buyer), and parcel C would be an L-shaped <br /> parcel which contains the north wing of the control Data <br /> Systems building. <br /> Bergly stated that the Planning Commission has recommended <br />. approval subject to the applicant dedicating rights-of-way <br /> where there are currently easements for abutting streets. <br /> He pointed out the location of utility and drainage <br /> easements and stated these easements have all been approved <br /> by the City Engineer. Bergly said recent State legislation, <br /> administered by watershed districts, requires that wetlands <br /> be defined, so Rice Creek Watershed District must review and <br /> approve wetland easements. He added that the surveyor has <br /> revised the subdivision plan and descriptions and has <br /> incl uded all the easements as recommended by the Planning <br /> Commission, and those changes are included in the plans <br /> shown tonight. <br /> Bergly explained that conveyance of property is intended and <br /> it is recommended by the Planning Commission that the <br /> applicant be allowed to submit this to the County for filing <br /> as a minor subdivision rather than a plat. <br /> Bergly advised that the Planning Commission and staff are <br /> recommending approval of Case #92-21 with the following <br /> conditions: 1 ) Parcels A, B, and C shall not include the <br /> rights-of-way of abutting streets either in the delineation <br /> on the subdivision plan or in the legal descriptions, 2) The <br /> City Engineer and Attorney review and approve the plan and <br /> any conveyance or easement documents prior to filing, 3) <br /> Rice Creek Watershed District review and approve wetland <br />. f:.'~s~-:nents , and 4) Park dedication be resolved prior to <br /> development of the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.