CCP 01-11-1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

pllonninq n-om.i"'$ion Meeting 5 1-06-93 . Cl\SE #92-23: MIN:R SUBDIVISlm/IOl' cnJRnT.~m AT 1585 JaIl\NN1> BOULEVARD. . DAN ~ (FCR Ml\JaUE 1\SHIll\CH) (eontinued) (Case #82-12) indicates. .."It is possible that the easement could be used for a=ess to the parcel to the north, b.1t the tqx.yLC1phy makes this unlikely." Sewer am water were subsequently installed in the easement b.1t the street is private. 3. No Plans to Build: Although it is a",co""""n that Tract B will be bJilt upon sometime in the future, there are no plans to do so at this time. 4. Tract A: Tract A will be canbined with the lot immediately to the south to create a single parcel. If these 2 lots are not combined, the city would be creating another bJilding site with the only possible access via the present driveway to oak Avenue. Due to the proposed combination am the separation frCll\ the vacant tracts to the east, an access easement is needed to utilize the present driveway to oak Avenue as access to the Ashbach home. Planner Bergly recommends approval of the lot division subject to the following =nditions: L That the action includes recognition that access to Tract B is across the existing roadway easement to Johanna Boulevard. . 2. That a d=ument combining Tract A with the lot immediately to the south am that an easement dc:x::umant providing access on the present driveway to oak Avenue across the large parcel to the east be approved by the city Attorney am that the lot division, lot combination am a=ess easement documents are filed =ncurrently with the Col.mty. 3. That any setback variances required on Tract B must be applied for when am if they are needed am that such variances are not included in this action. 4. That prior to any future divisions of any of the four parcels involved :ir1 this application, a sul:rlivision or developnent sketch be prepared showing how such a proposed division will fit into the long ran::je plans for the total property. piotrowski questioned if staff was aware of any existing drainage problems. Zoning Administrator Iago stated staff is not aware of any problems. winiecki commented that any future access to Tract B should be addressed in the Master Plan since the street as it stands now is far below City standards as a public street. Bergly stated at this time it is a privately ll'aintained street with public easements am utilities. . ProJ:st expressed concern that there may be a p:>tential problem if more than one single family dwelling is bJilt on Tract B. ProJ:st asked the applicant if he would be opposed to providing a covenant that only one single family dwelling would be bJilt on Tract B. Applicant stated he was not opposed, but rather favored the covenant.