CCP 01-11-1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

pbnn;,..g l'\ .....i "Sian Meetinq 4 1-06-93 Cl\SE #92-22. SITE PIAN l\MENDalNl'. SCHERm BROl'HERS LUMBER (Continued) . Winiecki asked Planner Bergly if he had looked at the previous larxiscapinJ . Planner Bergly stated it app?>'rs to be in good con:lition and Mr. Hood showed the Commission a colored Fhoto which showed the trees and shrubs. Probst questioned the exterior finish. Mr. Hood stated it will be ribbed concrete panel designed to minunick the other brilding. winiecki moved, secorrled by Erickson to rec::arnmeOO to Council approval of Case #92-22 the Amended site Plan Review subject to the 4 conditions listed in the Planner's report of 1-6-93. Motion carried unanimously. (7-0) Cl\SE #92-23: MIH:lR SUBDIVISICIl'/IOl' ()l3lRC1I'.~CIl' AT 1585 JamNNll BOVLEV1lRD. OlIN 1\SHBl\CH (FeR!mJlJRIE l\SHBl\CH) Planner Bergly referred to his report dated January 6, 1993, and explained the applicant requests a lot division of one of four contiguous parcels under common ownership at the intersection of Johanna Boulevard and Oak Avenue. All four parcels are involved in this action due to present and proposed lot combinations. 'Ihe parcel to be divided is 150 feet by 525 feet (1.8 acres) and will be divided into Tract A (34,800 sf) and Tract B (43,950 sf). Tract A will be combined with the lot directly to the south (64,321 sf). . It contains Marjorie Ashbach' s home and has access via Oak Avenue. Tract B will be a separate lot suitable for developnent and is proposed to have access from an easement providinJ access to four other banes to the south. The easterly 2 lots, owned by Mrs. Ashbach, with frontage on Oak Avenue (north lot) and on Oak Avenue and Johanna Boulevard (south tract) have been cambined previously and do not contain any brildings. The lot now proposed to be divided into Tracts A and B as discussed arove is presently cambined with these 2 easterly lots. Planner Bergly outlined the followinJ considerations: 1. Slooes/}l.rY'<>C<s: The major problem with developnent in this small geographic area is the extremely steep slopes. Proposed Tract B as described above has 48 feet of elevation change in 200' horizontal distance (24%) and slopes on other lots are in the 15% to 25% range. The slopes that make this area so attractive for hornesites also present severe problems for a=ess. Access by way of private easements or pan handle lots is virtually the only way to utilize this attractive area. The alternative is to maintain extremely large lots. Some fom of cluster development with private streets may also be an alternative worth explorir-g for other portions of the Ashbach property. 2. Access to Tract B: In Case #86-38, a lot split creatir-g 2 lots on the north en::l. of the easement from Johanna Boulevard just south of . Tract B, was approved by the City. This action det:ennined that the 30' wide easement provided adequate access to the 2 lots then proposed. A notation in the Planner's review of action requestir-g front yard setback variances for these 2 lots