Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . Arden Hills Council 5 January 11, 1993 <br /> Bergly commented that the applicant has agreed to all six <br /> conditions. <br /> Councilmember Malone commented that typically an arrangement <br /> such as this, with no access to an improved street would not <br /> be allowed, however, this is a unique situation, and the <br /> access issue appears to be addressed within the conditions. <br /> MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Aplikowski, to approve Case <br /> #92-23, Minor subdivision/Lot Consolidation at 1585 <br /> Johanna Boulevard, with the following conditions: <br /> l. That the action include recognition that access to <br /> Tract B is across the existing roadway easement to <br /> Johanna Boulevard, <br /> 2 . That a document combining Tract A with the lot <br /> immediately to the south and an easement document <br /> providing access on the present driveway to Oak Avenue <br /> across the large parcel to the east be approved by the <br /> City Attorney and the lot division, lot combination and <br /> access easement documents are filed concurrently with <br /> the County, <br /> . 3 . That any setback variances required on Tract B must be <br /> applied for when and if they are needed and that such <br /> variances are not incl uded in this action, <br /> 4. That prior to any future divisions of any of the four <br /> parcels involved in this application, a subdivision or <br /> development sketch be prepared showing how such a <br /> proposed division will fit into the long-range plans <br /> for the total property, <br /> 5. A covenant be attached to Tract B limiting potential <br /> future development of that Tract to only one single- <br /> family residence, <br /> 6. The City Engineer review and approve this case. <br /> Motion carried unanimously (3-0), <br /> CASE #92-24 - LOT COMBINATION; <br /> DAN ASHBACH. 1567 OAK AVENUE <br /> Planner Bergly reported that Case #92-24 involves a simple <br /> combination of two parcels, He explained that there is an <br /> existing home located about one to two feet from the lot <br /> line separating the two parcels, and there has been a <br /> covenant attached in previous variance action requiring that <br /> prior to selling the residence the lots are to be combined, <br /> as is now proposed. <br /> . Bergly reported that the Planning Commission recommended <br /> approval of this lot consolidation subject to City <br /> Attorney's approval of all documents prior to filing with <br /> the County, <br /> _ ___u_______.._ <br />