My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 07-26-1993
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
CCP 07-26-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:31 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:57:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> . <br /> Arden Hills Council 4 July 12, 1993 . <br /> potential Shoreline Lane connection and a logical alignment <br /> for future sewer and water connections, both of which are <br /> likely to be needed sometime in the future. He clarified <br /> that the outlining of lots in the study area is purely <br /> conceptual in nature for the purpose of establishing a <br /> "paper street". He added that the issue of future sewer <br /> connections came to the forefront when the Warren Hanson <br /> subdivision to the north of the study area was reviewed by <br /> the City, and the city recognized the sanitary sewer system <br /> in the area could become illogical and potentially <br /> problematic if not well thought out. <br /> Earl & Rosemary Morqan. 3130 Shoreline Lane: I have lived <br /> in the neighborhood 30+ years and like the fact that <br /> Shoreline Lane is disconnected and has very little traffic. <br /> I would like the situation to remain status quo. <br /> Robert Harty. 3137 Shoreline Lane: I echo earlier citizen <br /> conunents. I object to opening up Shoreline Lane as it would <br /> create more traffic in the area and we already have a . <br /> problem with the parking of boats on our street. <br /> Gary & Laura Meyers. 1134 Edqewater Road: I object to the <br /> . road and sanitary sewer concept under consideration and am <br /> concerned as to who would pay for potential improvements. <br /> Frank Heiderscheild. 3197 Shoreline Lane: I concur with <br /> previous citizens' objections and question who would pay for <br /> any improvements. <br /> Liz LaNasa, 3153 Shoreline Lane: I have lived in this <br /> neighborhood for 37 years and object to connecting the two <br /> existing sections of Shoreline Lane. I am submitting to <br /> Council letters from my neighbors, C.C. & Joyce Hsiao, 3131 <br /> Shoreline Lane and Donald Severson, 3146 Shoreline Lane, who <br /> also object. (Letters were read aloud.) I question why I <br /> did not receive notice of this meeting when my property is <br /> only 42' from the study area. <br /> Administrator Person and Planner Bergly explained that the <br /> City sent individual letters to neighbors in the area simply <br /> to ensure neighborhood notification, and published notice of <br /> the meeting in the official City newspaper as required by <br /> law. <br /> Bill Costello, 3159 Shoreline Lane: I have lived in this . <br /> neighborhood for IS years and strongly object to the concept <br /> presented this evening as it would disturb the peaceful and <br /> harmonious neighborhood we enjoy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.