Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . Arden Hills Council 3 July 12, 1993 <br /> interested in delineating a road alignment to be on file to <br /> indicate the City's interest and willingness to purchase <br /> appropriate right-of-way in the study area when the affected <br /> properties are sold or subdivided in the future. <br /> Bergly pointed out that the Planning Commission recommended <br /> that the alignment of the Shoreline Lane connection be a <br /> straight line between the existing dead ends. He noted <br /> that doing so would allow a maximum of nine lots to be <br /> created - three along Lexington Avenue and three on either <br /> side of the proposed Shoreline Lane connection. <br /> City Engineer Maurer further explained that existing <br /> sanitary sewer lines and easements in and around the study <br /> area were researched, and assuming the straight line <br /> Shoreline Lane connection alignment, sanitary sewer service <br /> could be provided via Lexington Avenue for lots potentially <br /> created along Lexington Avenue while sanitary sewer service <br /> to the remainder of the study area would require easement <br /> . acquisition through the Andersen and Bachman properties. <br /> Maurer stated that, assuming the straight through Shoreline <br /> Lane concept plan, estimated costs to provide services to <br /> . the nine lots would be $22,630 for total sanitary sewer, <br /> $15,760 for water, and $11,517 for overhead, for a total of <br /> $49,907. <br /> Following the order of signatures on the guest register, <br /> comments from citizens were invited. Comments made by <br /> citizens are as follows (not verbatim). <br /> Dorothy Harty. 3137 Shoreline Lane: I object to the concept <br /> plan presented this evening, and question whether the six <br /> lots created between Lexington Avenue and the proposed <br /> Shoreline Lane connection would be standard size. r wonder <br /> how this entire matter came about since neither Andersen nor <br /> Bachman are interested in subdividing. <br /> Bergly noted that the six conceptual lots between Lexington <br /> Avenue and the proposed Shoreline Lane connection would be <br /> slightly under the minimum lot size for this zoning <br /> district, but perhaps the potential lots could consider <br /> shared driveways for maximum use of the property. He added <br /> that this matter was prompted from a desire by the City to <br /> plan ahead for sensible and logical future development. <br /> . Councilmember Malone clarified that the matter being <br /> considered this evening is actually two fold in that there <br /> is a concern to plan ahead for both a logical alignment of a <br />