My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-24 PC Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2024
>
05-08-24 PC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2024 1:12:00 PM
Creation date
5/2/2024 12:37:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Existing <br />Proposed Garage Addition <br />Front Setback <br />40 feet <br />40 feet <br />Rear Setback <br />58.5 <br />58.5 feet <br />Side Yard Corner East <br />40.2 feet <br />28.2 feet <br />Side Yard West <br />10 feet <br />10 feet not im actin ) <br />Side Yard Total Both Side Yards <br />50.2 feet <br />38.2 feet <br />Landscaped Area —Meets Requirements <br />In the R-1 District, the minimum landscaped area required without a variance is 65% of the <br />property or 9,156.55 square feet. The Subject Property has an existing landscaped area of 10,456 <br />square feet or 74.22%. The proposal, including the garage addition and proposed driveway <br />addition, would decrease the total landscaped area by 765 square feet to 9,691 square feet, or <br />68.79% percent of the property. <br />Structure Coverage — Meets Requirements <br />The R-1 District allows for a maximum structure coverage of 25% or 3,521.75 square feet of the <br />Subject Property. The existing structure coverage is 2,697 square feet or 19%. The proposed <br />addition would increase the total structure coverage by 438 square feet for a total of 3,135 square <br />feet, or 22.25% of the Subject Property. <br />Floor Area Ratio — Meets Requirements <br />The R-1 District permits for a maximum floor area ratio of .3. Floor area is calculated as the sum <br />of the gross horizontal area of all floors of a building as measured in square feet from the exterior <br />walls, but not including decks; space where the average floor -to -ceiling height is less than six feet; <br />attached or detached garages; and other detached accessory structures. For the Subject Property, <br />the maximum floor area permitted is 4,226.1 square feet. The existing floor area for the lot is 3,550 <br />square feet and the floor area ratio is .252. The proposed addition includes an upper level principal <br />structure addition above the attached garage addition which would increase the property's floor <br />area by 386 square feet for a total of 3,936 square feet and a floor area ratio of .279. This calculation <br />is based on the design option without the additional dormer window. The Applicant has stated that <br />the design option with the additional dormer window would increase the property's floor area by <br />an additional 52 square feet for a total increase of 438 square feet. The total floor area would be <br />3,988 square feet and the floor area ratio would be .283. Square footage will be confirmed during <br />the building permit application review. <br />2. Variance Review <br />The role of the Planning Commission is to determine and consider how the facts presented to them <br />compare with the city's articulated standards. The Commission should base their decision on the <br />facts presented and then apply those facts to the legal standards contained in city ordinances and <br />relevant state law. Neighborhood opinion alone is not a valid basis for granting or denying a <br />variance request. While the Planning Commission may feel their decision should reflect the <br />overall will of the residents, the task in considering a variance request is limited to evaluating how <br />the variance application meets the statutory practical difficulties factors. Residents can often <br />provide important facts that may help in addressing these factors, however, unsubstantiated <br />opinions and reactions to a request do not form a legitimate basis for a variance decision. <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.