CCP 10-12-1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEHlRANIXlM mTE: October 13, 1993 TO: Dorothy A. Person, City Administrator FRai: Brian Fritsinger, rnmnmity Planning Coordinator stlBJ!X::I' : plannina Packets One of the iterrs that you and I have discussed is the process of providing the city Council with information on the monthly plannin:J' cases . with the recent change to reviewing plannin:J' cases at the last meeting of the month, my concern has been providing the most camplete and co=ect information in the most tilnely manner as possible. The pr=ess we undertake is as follows: 1.- Plannin:J' Packets/Reports mailed to City Council- October 28 2. Planning Commission Meeting - November 3 . 3. Administrative fOllow-up in newsletter - November 5 4. Draft minutes sent to City Council - November 12 5. City Council Meeting - November 29 I support the recent change of addressing the plannin:J' cases at the last meeting of the month. This allows staff to undertake any n~ssary follow-up in the weeks following the Plannin:J' Commission meeting. The pr=ess above worked well when the City Council acted on the items at the first meeting of the month. However, with the additional two week delay, I have a concern that the information the City Council has to review not being the most acarrate or detailed. I have also worked with City Councils that are not as concentious as this one about reviewing information prior to a meeting. I would like to suggest a change to this format. I am cognizant of the Councils need to get this information as soon as possible, so I am open to suggestions on my proposed format. 1- Planning report to Planning Commission and memorandum up:1ate to Council - Oct. 28 2. Planning Commission meeting - November 3 3. Administrative follow-up in newsletter - November 5 4. Draft minutes to City Council - November 12 5. Revised report to City council - November 26 . (or Nov.12) 6. City council meeting - November 29