Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . area beside the drive than the request asking for 4' would effect. After 8 years of <br /> this type of "parking space juggling", and daily stress of wondering if our 3, 5 or 7 <br /> year olds are in the driveway or street, we feel we should be allowed to make <br /> reasonable use of our property. <br /> Summary: <br /> We have attempted in good faith to minimize the impact on the sideyard setback <br /> ordinance. We have worked this issue every way possible. The neighbors are highly <br /> supportive. They would like to see us stay in the neighborhood. They feel that this <br /> project would update one of the older homes in the neighborhood. <br /> We understand the important issues of maintaining setbacks, keeping distance <br /> between buildings, not favoring one property owner over another, and staying <br /> within the ordinance for future property owners. <br /> What we do not understand is why our situation does not constitute hardship. In <br /> our situation, with a family of7, we can not make reasonable use of the property <br /> (and our land) with the existing conditions. The double garage is not a luxury; it is <br /> a necessity. <br /> Without the variance, we need to relocate. This feels like hardship to us. <br /> . <br /> . <br />