Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ---- <br /> Planning Ccmnission Meeting 10 11-03-93 <br /> 'Ibis greatly exceeds the 5.5 allowed. '!he fact that the ordinance was <br /> drafted with apartments in mind rather than institutional housing . <br /> supports the higher density per acre. <br /> With the added larrlscaping, there are no erosion, grading or drainage <br /> problem anticipated. Presbyterian Homes is still waiting f= a decision <br /> by the ROID on the plan itself. <br /> Chair winiecki asked if the applicant has anything to add. Mr. Lindh <br /> stated he was not aware of any homeowners experiencing problem with the <br /> new delivery schedule. Presbyterian Homes wishes to be a good neighbor. <br /> Mr. Lindh wrote a letter to the homeowners in the area an:i gave them his <br /> home phone number to enable any homeowner to contact him at any time if <br /> a problem arises. <br /> Mr. Erickson stated he attended the meeting with the representatives of <br /> Presbyterian Homes ard the neighbors ard stated he was ilnpressed with <br /> the willingness the representatives of Presbyterian Homes had to address <br /> all the concerns of the neighbors, as well as, their willingness to come <br /> to reasonable solutions to the concerns. <br /> Ms. piotrowski questioned ;vhether the applicant considered installing a <br /> locked gate. Mr. Lindh stated it was discussed ard a determination was <br /> made that the noise would be loud ard disturbing to the neighbors having <br /> delivery trucks sitting there idling at a gate. It was therefore <br /> determined that a gate was not appropriate at this time. '!he <br /> communication between the neighbors ard Presbyterian Homes should remedy <br /> this situation of early deliveries. . <br /> Mr. Carlson asked if a sign was posted stating the hours for acceptance <br /> of deliveries. The applicant stated it is posted on the delivery <br /> sheets, as well as on the doors. <br /> Ms. piotrowski questioned ;vhether the proposed landscaping is in <br /> carnpliance with the ordinance. Mr. Fritsinger stated yes. <br /> Mr. Petersen connnented he is in favor of the changes made to the <br /> waterfront area an:i is pleased at the way the applicant took care of the <br /> neighbors carnplaints. <br /> A clarification was asked to the number of residents. OJrrently there <br /> are 386 occupants ard with the SUP this would increase to 398. The <br /> corporate staff of 31 will be relocating to a different Presbyterian <br /> Homes site. <br /> Mr. Rye asked Mr. Lindh what would happen if a bread deli very truck <br /> arrived at 6:45 am. Mr. Lindh explained that giving his bame phone <br /> number to the neighbors would enable them to alert him of a problem. <br /> Mr. McGraw connnented he was pleased that most of the details have been <br /> worked out with the neighbors. Mr. McGraw further stressed that the <br /> applicant owes it to their neighbors to work out solutions to concerns <br /> an:i these situations should have not =ed in the first place. . <br /> Mr. Carlson questioned if the applicant was anticipating any Roseville <br /> expansion? Mr. Lindh stated there are =ently plans with NW College <br /> to consider expansion on the old Paul's Place site. Mr. Carlson then <br /> ---------- <br />