CCP 11-18-1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~--- --------- --- planning ccmni.ssion Meeting 2 11-03-93 Chair winiecki asked if there were any questions or comments in favor of . or opposition to this request. Hearing none, Chair winiecki close:i the public hearing at 7: 40 pm. Chair winiecki asked if thee were any questions or comments from the Conunission. Mr. Rye questioned what this easement does to the property directly north and the property directly south of this property, and are other properties affected by this easement. Mr. Fritsinger explained that this easement is an isolated easement and only recorded on this document and nothing has been found to dOCLm1el1t this easement continuing in either direction from this point. Mr. Erickson questioned whether all the other lots affected by this easement are developed? Mr. Fritsinger stated yes. Mr. Fritsinger stated he contacted a number of the other affected property owners and only one was aware of the easement because it was listed on his abstract. 'Ihis property owner was not one directly affected by this request. All the other property owners thought he was referring to the US Pipeline easement. Mr. Erickson questioned one point of clarification whether this request to vacate is only for Lot 6 or all of the lots affected by this easement? Mr. Fritsinger stated it was for lots 2 through 7 in the Shorewood Hills No.6 addition. Carlson moved, seconded by McGraw, to recommend to the . Council approval of the vacation of easement as outlined on Attachment F, Option 1, to include Lots 2 through 7. All voted in favor (6-0). ClISE #93-15; RYDER STllDENr 'l'RANSPClR'l7dCll - REZC.tlIN3. 1901 W. CCXJNrY ROAD F Chair winiecki opened the public hearing at 7: 44 );l1\. Recording Secretary Renee Kaulfuss confirmed the publication of the Notice of Hearing in the New Briohton Bulletin on Wednesday, October 20, 1993, and mailing to affected property owners on the same date. Chair winiecki explained that the applicant is requesting that the Comprehensive Plan be amended to reflect a commercial use at 1901 West County Road F and that the property be rezoned from R-1 to B-2 to comply with the amended Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Fritsinger referred to his report dated October 25, 1993 and outlined in detail the background infonnation relating to this property. 'lbe existing bJsiness at this property is =ently a non-conforming use and in order to make necessary improvements, the property will need to be rezoned to make the existing use conforming. Mr. Fritsinger outlined then his findings to both support and not support the rezoniD3' request. Mr. Fritsinger explained that the proposed rezoniD3' is not consistent with the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan. 'Ihe applicant suJ:xnitted an application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment concurrently with the application for rezoning. (If needed, . refer to your Planning packet report, Case #93-15) .