Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. Parkinq Areas: The site plan indicates that 269 parking spaces are <br /> available. The construction of the 34 unit addition will reduce the available <br /> parking by twelve to 257 stalls, <br /> 'Ihe ordinance requires one for every four residents plus one for each employee <br /> on major shift, plus one for each on-call medical professional, Between the <br /> McKnight Center and Lak:eview residence, there will be 398 residents. <br /> With the corrpletion of this project, it is planned to move 31 office staff to <br /> a central location off-site. The scheduling during the peak shift was stated <br /> to be 198. 'Ihis included enployees, volunteers, and residents. Under the <br /> Ordinance, 99 spaces would be required for the residents of the site. When <br /> canbined with the number of enployees on the peak shift, parking should be <br /> adequate. <br /> As stated before, the applicant is proposing to eliminate the north lot and <br /> extend the service drive. It also plans to accommodate fire and lift station <br /> access by including a 10-foot wide pathway on the north and east of building. <br /> 'Ihis drive will be constructed to supPort the weight of fire vehicles. <br /> Deliveries: It was noted that neighl::ors have expressed concerns in regards to <br /> the number and time of deliveries. Attached you will find a schedule of <br /> vendors. The applicant has contracts with the vendors and m:xlified the <br /> schedule to where deliveries will begin at 7:30 a.m. and Saturday deliveries, <br /> except trash, will be eliminated, <br />. 'Ihe applicant is also attenpting to address concerns in the garbage <:lurrpsters. <br /> All refuse will no,; be kept in the building until rrorning, except for <br /> occasional items. Pistons and plastic covers will also be utilized to <br /> minimize the sound. <br /> Landscaoinq: At the O:::tober 3, 1993 Planning Carmission meeting, a number of <br /> issues of concern were noted, First, the carment was made that the applicant <br /> has not followed-up and corrpleted previous landscaping requirerrents. A letter <br /> dated September 18, 1984 fran Consultant Planner Miller to the City Council <br /> stated the following; all landscaping has been carpleted as proposed in the <br /> landscaping plans. 'Ihis letter was in response to a similar concern on <br /> perform3Ilce notes at that time" Thus it appears that the applicant is in <br /> conform3Ilce with all pre-existing landscaping requirements. <br /> Second, there was a concern in regards to the screening available along <br /> Sandeen R03.d. The applicant is proposing to construct a 3-4 foot high berm on <br /> the south side of the existing tree line, in that area of concern identified . <br /> by the neighl::ors. In the area of the berm and between the berm and driveway, <br /> approximately 80 Arrerican White Cedar will be planted. With the addition of -- <br /> the expanded drive, 2 major crab apple trees will be lost. The applicant is <br /> also proposing to plant 7 spruce on the south edge of the berm. <br /> The applicant discussed potentially rroving the driveway further east. Staff <br /> felt that this change would make the situation worse for two reasons; rerroval <br /> of a large section of existing screening/trees and the drive would be a=ss <br />. fran a hane with inadequate screening. 'Ihe building additions will create two <br /> internal courtyards which will remain landscaped with trees and benches. <br /> Additional trees will be planted in the area of the 34 unit addition. <br />