Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> - _n _____________ <br /> , ~... <br />Planning Camlissian Meeting 2 12-01-93 <br />Mr. Fritsinger outlined the findings surrounding this request. (If . <br />needed, refer to your Plarming Packet rep::>rt, Case #93-24) . <br />Staff recarmends the approval of the Special Use Pe:rmit with the <br />following conditions: <br />A. No parking shall be pennitted on Hamline Avenue. Parking shall be <br /> limited to a minimum of tWJ spaces on the property. Parking shall <br /> be encouraged on the vacant lot (4340 Hamline Avenue). However, in <br /> order to keep the residential appearance of the property, no <br /> asphal ting shall be undertaken. <br />B. All signage needs to be approved through the City's Sign <br /> Ordinance/Permit process. <br />C. All sales/cash transactions are to =cur within the primary <br /> structure l=ated on the site (hctre/garage). <br />D. Any City/County/State business licenses be secured. <br />E. Sales be limited to perennial, related plants, and container grown <br /> plants and shrubs except during the holiday season when Christmas <br /> trees ITBY be sold. <br />F. No perrrBnent accessory st=ture be added for the use of the <br /> nursery (ie: greenhouse) or sales (ie: sales barn) . <br />G. Excess ChristITBS trees be rerroved f= the site by January 15 of . <br /> each year. <br />The Ccmnission ITBY also want to consider limiting the display area of <br />the Christmas trees. This WJUld be in regards to the proximity to <br />neighbors and Hamline Avenue. <br />Mr. Fritsinger noted that if the CotTmission were to reccmnend denial for <br />the request for a Special Use Pe:rmit, a one (1) year arrortization WJUld <br />be adequate because the applicant has no financial investment in <br />buildings or irrproverrents. Attorney Filla indicated that the five (5) <br />year clause of the Ordinance is based on owning buildings or other <br />related irrproverrents. <br />Chair Winiecki asked the applicant if he had anything to add to the <br />presentation. Mr. G::lserud explained their business is a first class <br />operation. The neighbors and SlllTOllI1ding carrnunity have no ccxnplaints <br />with his operation. The neighbors have told him that his business is <br />convenient for the neighborho:d and he has quality products and service. <br />Mr. G::lserud further stated that 90% of his customers are repeat <br />customers. Mr. G::lserud stated he did not realize until contacted by <br />City staff that he was not in canpliance. When he originally started <br />this business 20 years ago, he obtained all proper licensing and paid <br />the appropriate fees. <br />Mr. G::lserud also stated he paid the $200 application fee for the Special . <br />Use Pe:rmit under protest. Chair Winiecki informed Mr. G::lserud that the <br />application fee WJuld have to be addressed to the Council. The Planning <br />Ccmnission has no authority to address the application fee. <br />