Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Ccmnissian Meeting 4 12-01-93 ~, <br />Chair Winiecki instructed the Cam1ission that they w::JUld have to first . <br />vote on the amendment and then to vote on the original rrotion. <br />Carlson seconded the recarrrendation to approve the amendrrent <br />to condition (b) to limit the size of the signage to a 4 'x8' rrrod.mum <br />with no illtunination. All voted in favor (6-0). <br />All voted in favor of the original rrotion. (6-0) . <br />DIsctl5SICN - OI'HER PLANNING ISSUES: <br />Mr. Fritsinger up::Jated the Cam1ission on the berm at E'dgewater Estates. <br />He further explained that the final approval of the berm is contingent <br />llfX)n receiving a report fran a registered engineer or surveyor. <br />As noted in the packet this evening the Cam1ission treml::ers have received <br />a letter frem resident Joseph Jurkovich expressing his dissatisfaction <br />with the changes to the berm. Mr. Jurkovich stated at the time he <br />purchased his heme he was under the irrpression the berm was ccmpleted. <br />Mr. Jurkovich has further stated that the developer informed him that <br />the City was forcing him to change to height of the berm, and that Mr. <br />Jurkovich should talk with the City staff. <br />Mr. Fritsinger stated that staff has spoke with Mr. Jurkovich on several <br />occasions and tried to explain to him that the berm as he saw it when he <br />purchased his heme was not the approved height. City staff had not <br />inspected the developrrent (including the I::erm) as the project had not . <br />yet reached COll'pletion. <br />It was suggested to direct staff to write a letter to Mr. Jurkovich and <br />again explain the situation. The letter should include a ccmrent that <br />even though Mr. Jurkovich is the =-rent owner, if he w:::>uld sell and a <br />new owner w:::>uld question the height of the berm and check into City <br />records, the new owner w:::>uld find that the berm was not ccmpleted to <br />specifications. It should I::e further noted that Mr. Jurkovich should <br />direct his =ncerns to the developer. <br />Chair winiecki stated that member Barbara Piotrowski addressed a conce-"TI <br />over the tentative schedule for January. Mr. Fritsinger reviewed the <br />agenda and proposed possible cases that ID3.y be dropped frem the January <br />agenda schedule. <br />Chair Winiecki noted two new canopy signs that were erected at St. Paul <br />Bcok and Stationary. The signs are acceptable, but staff should remind <br />this business that the canopy signs are included in the overall formula <br />for total signage. <br />c.'OtINCIL REPORT <br />Council Liaison Dale Hicks reported to the Ccmnission that roth Case <br />#93-25, James Hanton, and Case #93-22, Presbyterian Hanes were approved <br />by Council as recCX11TleI1ded. . <br />Councilmember Hicks upjated the Cam1ission on TCMP stating that <br />Councilmember Probst recently met with representatives fran TCMP, the <br />National Guard and Ramsey County. It was lCXJking very promising that <br />these three forms of government support our efforts and will be sending <br />