Laserfiche WebLink
<br />J , <br />. To: Arden Hills City Council Members <br /> Subject: SUMMARIZATION OF RYDER BUS TERMINAL ISSUE <br /> From: Village residents in area to east of Bus Barns (those who signed the initial petition. <br /> directed to the Planning. Commission. and others. whose names you may h.aye reccln:d since, <br /> Date: 25 Jan. 1993 <br /> We would like to address the above subject. clarify our position on it and go into a little more <br /> depth, here. on the reasons why we feel that the operation of a bus terminal on the above property <br /> adversely affects our neighborhood and is no longer an appropriate use for this land. Here is a list. <br /> in order of adverse impact (gre:ncsllirst, elC.), of the things that are affecting us: <br /> 1. Eyesore - The ugly pole barns and the sea of parked buses, trucks and employee vehicles that <br /> one encounters as they approach our neighborhood is unsightly. (This is undisputed. even by the owners <br /> of the property.) According to Brian Fritsinger's Memorandum to the Planning Commission. of 22 <br /> Nov. (See the laSl two paragraphs on Pg,3). ~No formal landscaping is proposed along County Road F <br /> because of visibility/safety concerns and plant survivability." It would take an extensive and ex- <br /> pensive effot to hide this area adequately from the road. <br /> 1 a. Devalued Properties of Home Owners - Because of this unsightly west gate to our <br /> neighborhood and the other adversities. accounted below, property values in our neigh- <br /> borhod have suffered. Imagine trying to sell your house. if you lived on County Road F (Pothole <br />. Avenue), now! We believe that potential prospects have been substantially diminished. When pro- <br /> viding CMA 's (Competitive Markel Analysis) on homes along County Road F, realtors have made the <br /> remark that. ~The price could be more if the house wasn't located on such a busy streeL~ <br /> 2 . Traffic - The excessive amount of traffic generated by the bus terminal operation is a detriment <br /> to our neighborhood and a constant annoyance and safety hazard. particularly to those who <br /> live on County Road F. This traffic creates a lot of noise and smelly air pollution. Bruce <br /> Dischinger. of Ryder, said. at the 5-Jan. Planning Commission meeting. "Removingthe terminal <br /> would reduce traffic insignificantly and could possibly lead to an increase," This is ridiculous. <br /> What he' s forgetting is the employee traffic that comes and goes, 4 times a day (arrivalond <br /> departUre in the morning. arrival and deputurein the afternoon)! And. that's for all of the buses which are <br /> used out of there. nO[ only to service District 621 but others as well. <br /> We. of course.' realize that not all of the buses and employees use County Road F. to the east of <br /> Mounds View High School. but the number is relative and it's still too much. MVHS uses only 35 <br /> buses - most only half full! If the terminal was removed from this location. we would see only <br /> that portion of those 35 buses which need to come and go from the east of the school. There <br /> would be no employee traffic, at all. and this would constitute a very significant decrease fOl <br /> us! And, it could be reduced even more. if only those buses which serve the immediate <br /> neighborhood were allowed to use County Road F, to the east of MVHS. All other buses could <br /> ingress and egress MVHS from the west without losing more than 1 minute on their run. (They <br /> would use Hwy 96, to lhe northeast and County Road 8. to the southeasL) I doubt that we have any high <br /> school bus traffic from the neighborhood - it's so close; so, we probably would only see and hear <br /> the elementary buses which serve the area. jf this idea was implemented. <br /> If there are 165 buses (See Pg, 2. #3 of B.F. 22 Nov, Memo) operating from this property. that require <br />. 165 employees to drive them. this equals 1180 vehicle trips to and from the property. that would <br /> not take place if the terminal were notthere! 165 X 4 (employee traffic) + ( 165 - 35) X 4 = 1180. <br /> 35 is the numberof buses that serve MVHS. The proportion of buses and employees that use the <br /> east access should be factored in. to arrive at the number which directly affects our neighborhood. <br />