My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-17-1994
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CCP 03-17-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:44 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 3:13:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> --- <br /> 03/11/94 13:41 NSAC/NSCC 002 <br /> ..,.:::~.... <br /> '1--.. <br /> _./~". ACTION ALERT <br /> . .../' ~~l _:.. _.~ <br /> ~, " ~&., "" <br /> ...... "~:.:...';.. <br /> '~... <br /> . :j.'N <br /> .....,.,~ <br /> ~I'.'..~:...~ <br /> ",." . ~ ... '7." <br /> -<~i' <br /> <:,~;~.*. .:.~. r j <br /> '--<_::..(::"W <br /> .......< ' <br /> '<v"- <br /> The National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors <br /> !vi affiliate of the Notiooolleague of Cities ~ <br /> March 8, 1994 <br /> Congress is now seriously considerinalegislation to allow telephone companies to enter the <br /> cable market without a local franchise. Local oMcials must act now to safeguard our <br /> communities. interests. <br /> The House Telecommunications Subcommittee has passed H.R. 3636, which has no fr~nchising <br /> requirement for teloos providing cable. While H.R. 3636 would pennit a local government to <br /> impose a fee, even that provision would not match the franchise fee obligation of cable <br /> companies. The full House Energy and Commerce Committee is expected to act on H.R. 3636 <br /> . as early as next week! The bill then will go to the House floor for action. <br /> The Senate Commerce Committee is now holding hearings on S. 1822, which appears to require <br /> a franchise for teIeos providing cable but is silent on whether video diallone service would need <br /> a franchise. While S. 1822 is therefore far superior to the House bill in that regard, there will <br /> be efforts to weaken it as the process moves forward. <br /> The Clinton Administration supports teleo entry into the cable market without a franchise. Even <br /> more alarming, a White House position paper recommends relieving cable companies of their <br /> franchise obligations in most instances. <br /> In the rush to unleash the telephone companies and promote competition, many Washington <br /> officials are ignoring the community needs and interests protected by tJle franchising system. IF <br /> LOCAL OFFICIALS DO NOT ACT NOW, CONGRESS MAY SOON PASS, AND THE <br /> PRESIDENT MAY SIGN, LEGISLATION TO PREEMPT LOCAL JURISDICTION AND <br /> ALLOW USE OF RlGlITS-OF-WAY WITH NO COMMUNITY OBLIGATIONS. <br /> You should immediately brief local elected officials in your area and urge them to communicate <br /> as soon as possible with your Senators and Representatives. Personal meetings or telephone call.s <br /> are better than letters. <br /> . The key points to make are: <br /> . Telephone companies should be subject to the same obligations as cable <br /> companies, a level playing field. <br /> . Telephone companies should not object to making the same commitments to the <br /> community as cable companies. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.