My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 10-31-1994
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CCP 10-31-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:03 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 3:35:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> o. . ~ <br /> . <br /> . The existing 4" slab cannot accommodate the heavy traffic generated <br /> throughout the year. The slab will crack, spall or deteriorate. <br /> . Flammable waste traps and drains would need to be incorporated into <br /> the floor system to meet code, not an easy feat. <br /> . The existing overhead door heights and widths for vehicle access are <br /> not acceptable. Renovating these openings would actually be slightly <br /> more money than starting with a solid wall and providing the same <br /> oversized, overhead doors. <br /> . The clear height of the building is barely acceptable, and limited at <br /> best. Portions of the roof structure would have to be raised. Note that <br /> this could also be viewed as an opportunity (i.e. raised skylight areas <br /> could be added for both height and daylight). <br /> . The existing HVAC system is most likely inadequate for the vehicle <br /> area. Requirements for this type of use far exceeds that available in <br /> the building. The existing system is a old and inefficient at best, but <br /> may be serviceable for a few years, for office use. <br /> . The building is very inefficient from an energy/insulation standpoint. . <br /> This ongoing cost should be explored as a part of the package. <br /> . There will be a good deal of cost for electrical distribution. The total <br /> electrical capacity will have to be reviewed in more detail, but it is safe <br /> to say it is on the minimal side, especially given the welding, power <br /> and equipment requirements for both public works and <br /> administration. <br /> . The site area is grossly inadequate for all projected use and storage <br /> needs. The water tower site adds almost nothing to the equation. The <br /> site to the south includes a good manufacturing/shipping building but <br /> does little to help in the open site requirements for the city. Further, <br /> the adjacent building and the one in question do not have a good fit <br /> with the needs of the city, as a combined deaL I can expound on this, <br /> at your request. <br /> .. The exterior pavement is in poor condition. A simple overlay in this <br /> case would not be prudent, as the existing sub-base, base and <br /> pavement design are far from adequate for the public works' regular <br /> 5 to 8 ton vehicle/ equipment loads. <br /> 7) There are many other less significant items that we could discuss, but any <br /> retrofit of any building would have its share of minor "fit" problems. . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.