Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> number of ballots returned as well as the number that are accepted, fu addition, <br /> reforms will decrease current local administrative burdens and costs. <br /> . <br /> SD-5. Presidential Primary Voter Designation <br /> Problem: Lack of voter interest and anger over political party designation requirements (to <br /> receive a ballot) have resulted in poor turn-out for the presidential primary as well as <br /> increased local election costs. <br /> Solution: The presidential primary is a political activity in which voters indicate <br /> preferences for presidential candidates of major political parties. Cities are not the <br /> appropriate level of government to take responsibility for administering the balloting <br /> process. fu 1996, cities prefer to see the state conduct the primary using a statewide <br /> mailed ballot for which any local administrative costs will be fully compensated. fu <br /> addition, the state should redesign the precinct voter rosters indicating which political <br /> party ballot voters select to safegnard voter privacy and ensure accurate recording of <br /> voter ballot selection. Finally, the state should fully fund the presidential primary and, <br /> if necessary, charge major political parties whose candidates appear on the ballot for an <br /> appropriate share of expenses incurred. <br /> SD-6. Election Judges <br /> . Problem: Requirements for local election judge political party balance (at polling locations) <br /> creates barriers to the effective recruitment of interested persons to serve at polling places. <br /> Restrictions on parents-children-spouses serving at the same location do likewise. <br /> Solution: The legislature should institute a nonpartisan method for recruiting those <br /> interested in serving as election judges. <br /> SD-7. Local Government Cooperation and Collaboration <br /> Problems: Some of the most difficult barriers to intergovernmental cooperation result from <br /> geography, demographics, and political traditions rather than financial considerations. In the <br /> past, fiscal and political pressures have resulted in shifting responsibility for the operation <br /> and costs of programs to cities without funding. State policymakers have also often failed to <br /> give cities credit for their extensive involvement in cooperative agreements with other units <br /> of local government to change responsibilities for funding and delivering services. <br /> . <br /> Solutions: <br /> The federal, state, and county governments should: <br /> . . Communicate and establish a process of negotiation before shifting responsibility <br /> 1995 City Policies 5 <br />