CCP 11-28-1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

---------------- ____on . Honorable Mayor and City Council . August 18, 1994 Page Four mile in the City of Arden Hills was $27,749.00. This would be approximately the amount of additional construction dollars the City would receive per mile for each County Road placed on the MSA system but not totally reconstructed. In other words, if the County were to bring a roadway to level 90 and turn it back to the City, and the City were to place it on their Municipal State Aid system, this would be the increase in annual allotment that could be expected. Assuming the City would choose to reconstruct County Road F before placing it on the system, and possibly reconstruct Stowe Avenue or not be allowed to place it on the MSA system, the following list indicates what the City might expect in additional annual Slate Aid construction funds should the remaining roads be turned back and placed on the City system. MSA Annual Spg:J1'pnt Miles A. J1n...~tjnn County Road F 0.92 -0- Hamline Avenue 0.32 $ 8,880.00 Ingerson Road 0.49 13,597.00 Lake Johanna Boulevard 0.83 23,032.00 Snelling Avenue 0.13 3,607.00 Stowe Avenue 0.25 -0- . Estimated Total Annual MSA Allocation Increase $49,116.00 If a roadway on the MSA system is reconstructed, the City no longer receives needs for total reconstruction. However, a minimal amount of the annual needs is provided based on an overlay of the road. Twenty years after the date of reconstruction, the roadway begins to again receive full reconstruction needs. E. CONCLUSIONIRECO.MMEi'IDA TION The County has indicated they would like to accomplish the turnback of all roadways within a ten year window. They have,asked each City to review the roadways within their community and indicate to the County the type of turnback option they would see utilizing and the time frame to do that. It would be my recommendation that County Road F would be reconstructed under Turnback Option 2 as quickly as possilile. Stowe Avenue is the only other roadway that would reasonably make sense to utilize Option 2 for reconstruction. Since it may be questionable whether this one may be placed on the MSA system after turnback, the timing of the reconstruction would be based on the City's desires and ability to fund other improvements associated with reconstruction, such as the relaying of the sanitary sewer line in that area. The remaining roadways I believe all fall under Turnback Option 1 where the . County does minimal work to bring the roadway to level 90, turns it back to the City, and the City in turn places it on its Municipal Slate Aid system. The two scenarios that seem to make sense here would be to either take these roadways as quickly as 5201043~ 1802.;lUg